HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. KUMARESH BABU, J.
M/s. Secular Trust, Represented by its Sole Managing Trustee & Administrator, D. Indrajith, Chennai - Appellant
Versus
M/s. OMR Outdoor Media Reach LLP, An incorporated LLP under LLP Act 2008, Represented By its Designate Partner, B. Sinduja, Chennai - Respondent
O.P. No 763 of 2022
Decided On : 20-03-2023
Indian Trust Act 1882 - Permission to Sell Property - The court permitted the petitioner trust to sell a portion of the property, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of balance sale consideration and utilization of the sale proceeds for the trust's objectives.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought permission to sell a portion of the property for a specific sale consideration. The respondent had made a partial payment and undertook to pay the balance.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had complied with the order to publish a sale notice and had received inquiries but no offers. The respondent had made a partial payment and provided an undertaking for the balance.
Issues: The issues involved the permission to sell the property, the respondent's partial payment, and the presence of third-party tenants affecting the sale.
Ratio Decidendi: The court permitted the sale of the property subject to conditions, including the payment of balance sale consideration and the utilization of sale proceeds for the trust's objectives.
Final Decision: The court permitted the petitioner to sell the property to the respondent, subject to specified conditions, and made no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT
(PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 34 of the Indian Trust Act 1882, to pass the following orders:
a) Permitting the Petitioner Trust to sell the Schedule “B” property on “as is where is basis” admeasuring 79045 sq.ft. for a sale consideration of Rs.18,00,00,000/- to the respondent.
b) Directing the respondent to make payment of balance sale consideration to the petitioner and conclude the entire purchase transactions and register Sale Deed for Schedule “B” property within 180 days from the date of the order of this Court.
c) Directing that the expenses incurred on this account to be borne from and out of the funds of the Trust and
d) For such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit, proper and necessary under the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.)
1. The instant Original Petition has been preferred seeking permission to sell a portion of the property more fully described in the Schedule “B” to the petition admeasuring 79045 sq.ft. for a sale consideration of Rs.18,00,00,000/-.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.02.2023, this Court considering that the offer made by the respondent herein was only 80% of the guideline value, the petitioner was directed to publish a sale notice in one issue of the English daily, “Times of India” and in one issue of the Tamil daily, “Dhinathanthi” calling for bids for purchase of the property as is where is basis. The petitioner was also directed to place such bids before this Court on the next date of hearing.
3. Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, an affidavit was filed on behalf of the petitioner indicating compliance of the order dated 22.02.2023. The Paper Publication made in pursuant to the aforesaid order was also placed on record, I am satisfied the manner in which the Paper Publication has been effected by the petitioner. The petitioner had also in his affidavit stated that pursuant to the Paper Publication there were three enquiries on 03.03.2023 and two enquiries on 04.03.2023, along with the affidavit, the visitors note book that was maintained pursuant to the Paper Publication has been produced.
4. The petitioner had also further made an averment that even though there were five enquiries on that date, no offers have been received by them from any person.
5. A counter affidavit has also been filed by the respondent, wherein he had indicated payment a sum of Rs.1,60,00,000/- to the petitioner and they had also given an undertaking that the respondent has the financial capacity to mobilize the balance sale consideration at the time of registration of the Sale Deed.
6. The petitioner in his affidavit has categorically stated that there are third party tenants in the property only for which reason, it was not able to find any purchaser.
7. Considering the averments made in the petition and also considering the affidavit filed by the petitioner dated 16.03.2023, I am of the view that the claim of the petitioner can be considered subject to the following conditions:
(a)The respondent shall make the payment of balance sale consideration and take steps to get the Sale Deed registered for petition mentioned “B” Schedule property within a period of 180 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(b)The sale consideration so received by the petitioner shall be only utilized towards the object for which the Trust had been incorporated.
(c)The petitioner shall file the accounts relating to the sale consideration and also place on record the purpose for which the sale consideration is to be utilized by the Trust within a period of 90 days from the date of registration of Sale Deed.
8. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to sell the petition mentioned “B” Schedule property as is where is basis measuring an extent of 79045 for a sale consideration of Rs.18,00,00,000/- to the respondent subject to the aforementioned conditions.
9. W
The court's decision was based on the Indian Trust Act 1882 and the conditions imposed were in line with the objectives of the trust.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that trustees must adhere to the specific provisions and restrictions outlined in the testator's will when managing and disposing of trust prope....
The central legal point established is that the Charity Commissioner must determine whether the sale of the trust property is necessary and in the interest of the trust before granting permission und....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the respondent to justify and record satisfaction for high valuation based on comparable sale instances and material evidence w....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Charity Commissioner must consider the interest, benefit, and protection of the trust when granting permission for property disposal, a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.