Corridor-3
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
M/s. Chennai Metro Rail Limited, Rep. By its Managing Director, METROS, Chennai - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Additional Chief Secretary, Environment, Climate Change & Forest Department, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2842 of 2023 & WMP No. 2582 of 2023
Decided On : 05-04-2023
Writ Petition - Rerouting of 230 KV feeders for Metro project - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - G.O.Ms.No.23 Planning, Development and Special Initiatives [SI] Department, dated 13.04.2017 - Crl.O.P.Nos.4413 of 2013 and 22457 of 2015 dated 19.08.2021
Fact of the Case:
The Chennai Metro Rail Limited filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the application for rerouting of existing 230 KV feeders for the construction of an elevated corridor of Metro project (Phase-II). The project is part of the Chennai Metro Rail Project, which aims to decongest traffic in Chennai.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the rerouting of the electric transmitting cables for the Metro project was a one-time non-forestry activity that would benefit the public and the environment. The Court also noted that the earlier order prohibiting non-forestry activity in the Pallikaranai marsh did not apply to the proposed rerouting.
Issues: The main issue was whether the proposed rerouting of the electric transmitting cables for the Metro project constituted a non-forestry activity and whether it would damage the environmental development in the Pallikaranai marsh.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the rerouting of the cables was a one-time non-forestry activity that would not cause environmental damage and was in the public interest. The Court also emphasized that the earlier order prohibiting non-forestry activity did not apply to the proposed rerouting.
Final Decision: The Court directed the competent authorities to grant permission and cooperate with the petitioner to complete the project within two months.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the application in online portal PARIVESH-II dated 09.01.2023 submitted by the 2nd respondent seeking approval for rerouting of existing 230 KV feeders vide proposal No.FP/TN/TRANS/41326/2023 for facilitating construction of elevated corridor of Metro project (Phase-II), within a time limit.)
A writ of mandamus has been instituted by the Chennai Metro Rail Limited, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the application in online portal PARIVESH-II dated 09.01.2023, submitted by the 2nd respondent seeking approval for rerouting of existing 230 KV feeders vide proposal No.FP/TN/TRANS/41326/2023, for facilitating construction of elevated corridor of Metro project (Phase-II), within a time limit to be stipulated.
2. The petitioner states that the Chennai Metro is a rapid transit system serving the city of Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. It is the fourth longest metro system in India after Delhi Metro, Hyderabad Metro and Namma Metro. The Phase-I of the Chennai Metro Rail Project consists of two colour-coded lines covering a length of 54.15 kilometres (33.65mil). The Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL), a joint venture between Government of India and the Government of Tamil Nadu, built and operates the network. The system has a mix of underground and elevated stations and uses standard gauge.
3. The Chennai Metro Rail Limited is a special purpose vehicle (SPV) formed for the purpose of implementing the Chennai Metro Rail Project. The project is being funded by the Government of India and the State Government by way of equal equity contribution and subordinate debt (Government of India 20%, Government of Tamil Nadu 20.78% and the balance 59.22% being met from the loan assistance from Japan International Co-operation agency). The Government of India has also accorded sanction for the project.
4. Considering the acute traffic congestion and thereby hardship to the public by way of economic loss, accidents, pollution etc., phase-I of the Chennai Metro Rail project was initially planned for a length of 45kms in two Corridors. Finally, the two Corridors were covered a length of 45.046km network and consisted, Corridor-I – from Washermenpet to Airport (23.085 Km) and Corridor-2 – from Chennai Central to St. Thomas Mount (21.961 km). About 55% of the Corridors in Phase-I is underground and the remaining extent are elevated. Out of 32 numbers of stations, 13 numbers are Elevated Stations and remaining 19 numbers are underground Stations. Inter Corridor interchange Stations are available in Alandur (Elevated) and Chennai Central (Underground) respectively.
5. On account of the success of the Phase-I and Phase-I Extension of Chennai Metro Rail Projects, the Government in G.O.Ms.No.23 Planning, Development and Special Initiatives [SI] Department, dated 13.04.2017, had approved in principle the following three Metro Rail Corridors under Phase-II of Chennai Metro Rail Project. The present estimate cost of the project is about Rs.63,246/- Crores. The details of the corridors covered under Phase-II is as follows:
| 1. | Corridor-3 | Madhavaram to Siruseri | 45.77 Kms |
| 2. | Corridor - 4 | Poonomallee to Light House | 25.70 Kms |
| 3 | Corridor -5 | Madhavaram to | 44.66 Kms |
|
|
| Total | 107.55 Kms |
6. As part of Phase-II, CMRL has proposed to construct an elevated Metro Corridor from Alandur to Shollinganallur Tower (14.653 kms), part of which is proposed to pass over and above the existing road adjacent to Perumbakkam Marsh Land, which is under the control of reserve forest at the southern side of Medavakkam-Shollinganallur Road.
7. For the above purpose of construction of the elevated Metro Corridor, deviation of 230 KV overhead feeders in existing
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of obtaining statutory permissions and approvals, complying with the terms and conditions imposed in the statutory approvals, and....
Land acquisition proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 require the consideration of objections following the issuance of the formal notification under....
State authorities must ensure that a landowner’s objections are duly received and considered in accordance with the statutory requirements prescribed under the land acquisition laws.
State authorities must adhere to statutory land acquisition procedures, which include providing a platform for landowners to submit objections once the formal notice of acquisition under the relevant....
State authorities must ensure due process and consideration of individual objections during land acquisition proceedings, particularly following the issuance of statutory notifications under the rele....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.