Back
K. MURALI SHANKAR
R. Mohamed Elias @ Mohamed Eliyas – Appellant
Versus
State represented through The Inspector of Police, Dindigul – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records of impugned Charge Sheet in S.T.C.No.939 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioners.)
1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records pertaining to the case in S.T.C.No.939 of 2022 pending on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul and quash the same.
2. The petitioners are the accused 1 to 5 in S.T.C.No.939 of 2022 pending on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.
3. On the basis of the complaint lodged by one Suppuraj, Village Administrative Officer, Adiyanuthu Village, FIR came to be registered in Crime No.1617 of 2020 on 31.07.2020 for the alleged offences under Sections 143, 341, 283 and 269 IPC against the accused including the petitioners herein.
4. The first respondent, after completing the investigation, has laid a final report dated 24.11.2021 under Section 173 Cr.P.C. against the petitioners for the alleged offences under Sections 143, 341 and 283 IPC and the case was taken
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for evidence to prove the elements of alleged offenses under Sections 143, 341, and 283 IPC, as well as the adherence to the tim....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that democratic dissent and protests must be protected, and the prosecution must prove the elements of alleged offences beyond reasonable doubt.
The central legal point established is that democratic dissent cannot be stifled by registering FIRs for expressing dissatisfaction with governance, and the guidelines for an offence under Section 18....
FIR for unlawful assembly and wrongful restraint during road-blocking protest to pressure police not quashed as allegations disclose prima facie offence; no mini-trial at quashing stage despite right....
FIR quashed due to failure to file final report within one-year limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C. for petty offences.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
