Back
P. N. PRAKASH, R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Vincent – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment dated 25.09.2012 in S.C.No.125 of 2011, on the file of the Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari Division, Nagercoil.
This criminal appeal is filed against the Judgment and Order, dated 25.09.2012,in S.C.No.125 of 2011, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari Division, Nagercoil.
2. The Trial Court framed two charges against the appellant, as detailed below:
| Charge | Penal Provisions |
| 1. | 302 I.P.C. |
| 2. | 201 I.P.C. |
3. The Trial Court, by Judgment and Order, dated 25.09.2012 convicted and sentenced the accused as under:
| Section of Law | Sentence of imprisonment | Fine amount |
| 302 I.P.C. | To undergo imprisonment for life. | Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for four (4) years. |
| 201 I.P.C. | To undergo three (3) years rigorous imprisonment. | Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six (6) months. |
The sentences imposed on the accused were ordered to run concurrently. The period of se
The principle that an accused cannot be convicted based on suspicion alone, and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases relying on circumstantial evidence.
Murder – Only on the basis of post-mortem report there cannot be conviction for offence punishable under Section 302, I.P.C.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, a complete and unbroken chain of evidence is necessary to satisfy the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction.
Circumstantial evidence can sustain a conviction for murder when the accused fails to provide a plausible explanation for the deaths of the victims, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the delay in lodging the complaint, presence of alcohol in the victim's system, and the appellant's intention to determine the....
A dying declaration can serve as a basis for conviction, especially when corroborated by consistent witness testimonies and medical findings related to the incident.
The establishment of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt can support a conviction for homicide and destruction of evidence under IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
