SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3571

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
C. Major Sathia Moorthy Gopalan – Petitioner
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation – Respondent
W.P. Nos. 9578, 9579, 9580 of 2011, M.P. No. 2 of 2011, M.P. No. 1 of 2012, W.M.P. Nos. 5632, 5633, 5634, 5635 of 2017
Decided On : 23-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: V. Balakrishnan.
For the Respondents: Vijay, Anand, Abdul, Vinodh, G. Baskaran.

Headnote:

Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Section 5 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Notice - Peaceful Possession - Quash - Service Period - Disability - Dealership agreement - licencee - Held, This Court after considering found that Defence Department is finding it difficult to maintain property which all are not in possession and leased out for some commercial purposes - Defence properties are to be utilised for providing infrastructure facilities for benefit of Defence Department and if properties are going to be leased out for commercial purposes to third parties Defence Department is finding it difficult even to collect rent from such tenants or lease holders and struggling to vacate lessees - Writ Petitions Dismissed.

ORDER :

Prayer in W.P. No. 9578 of 2011: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the Notice No. Q/86-B/IV/3/MC dated 31.3.2011 of the second respondent and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and business activity of the property situated at No. 1, Evening Bazaar, Chennai-3, bearing R.S. No. 10116/2 to an extent of 4792.5 till the first respondent re-allot the dealership to the petitioner of any other Petrol bunk.

Prayer in W.P. No. 9579 of 2011: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the Notice No. Q/86-B/IV/3/MC dated 31.3.2011 of the second respondent and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and business activity of the property situated at No. 1, Farzer Bridge Road, MUC Corner, Chennai-3, bearing R.S. No. 10116/2 Pt to an extent of 5942 sq. ft. till the first respondent re-allot the dealership to the petitioner of any other Petrol bunk.

Prayer in W.P. No. 9580 of 2011: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the Notice No. Q/86-B/IV/3/MC dated 31.3.2011 of the second respondent and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and business activity of the property situated at No. 2, Rattan Bazaar, Chennai-3, bearing R.S. No. 11378/15 to an extent of 4870.2 sq. ft. till the first respondent re-allot the dealership to the petitioner of any other Petrol bunk.

1. The notice issued under sub section 1 of Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 is under challenge in the present writ petitions.

2. The petitioner in W.P. No. 9578 of 2011 served as Major in Indian Army and during the service period he suffered injuries and became disabled. Thus, he was allowed to retire from the service.

3. The first respondent Indian Oil Corporation allotted the retail outlet dealership to sell Petrol, Diesel and other Petroleum products under the defence category of personnel whose disability is attributable to active military service at No. 1, Evening Bazaar, Chennai-3. The second respondent Defence Estate Officer leased out the property to Indian Oil Corporation. In turn, the Indian Oil Corporation granted licence to the petitioner to run retail outlet dealership of Petrol Bunk at No. 1, Evening Bazaar, Chennai-3 for a period of 15 years commencing from 12.04.2006 by entering into dealership agreement dated 12.04.2006. However, the agreement between the Indian Oil Corporation and the petitioner was renewed.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that under Sub-Section 2(b) of Section 4 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, all the persons concerned are entitled for notice and no such notice was issued to the writ petitioner and thus the impugned order is liable to be set aside. On this ground, an interim order was granted by this Court and the writ petition is pending for about 10 years. Pursuant to the interim stay granted by this Court, the petitioner is operating the retail Petrol Bunk.

5. Interestingly, the learned Central Government Standing Counsel states that a sum of Rs. 8,99,79,194/- in W.P. No. 9578 of 2011, Rs. 9,56,71,990/- in W.P. No. 9579 of 2011 and Rs. 6,46,11,015/- in W.P. No. 9580 of 2011 towards arrears of rent is to be paid to the Defence Department. Inspite of several demands, the arrears of rent has not been paid by the Indian Oil Corporation and the Defence property is with the possession of the Indian Oil Corporation without payment of rent and therefore, they are liable to be evicted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top