Back
S. ANANTHI
Thangakani – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Inspector of Police, CCIW-CID – Respondent
ORDER :
PRAYER : Criminal Revisions filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the Judgment dated 22.04.2016 made in C.A. No.45 of 2015 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Court, Tuticorin, confirming the Judgment dated 02.09.2015 made in C.C. No.24 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Tirunelveli (C.C.I.W. Special Court) and set aside the same as illegal.
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the revision petitioner to set aside the Judgment, dated 22.04.2016 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tuticorin, in C.A. No.45 of 2015, confirmed the Judgment dated 02.09.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirunelveli (C.C.I.W. Special Court) in C.C. No.24 of 2009.
2. As against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirunelveli (C.C.I.W. Special Court) in C.C. No.24 of 2009, dated 02.09.2015, the petitioner/A-2 has preferred an appeal before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tuticorin, in C.A.No.45 of 2015. The lower appellate Court, by Judgment dated 22.04.2016, dismissed the appeal an
The judgment emphasizes the importance of documentary evidence and entries in proving guilt in cases of misappropriation and falsification of accounts.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the accused, as the Secretary of the bank, for misappropriation and falsification of documents, leading to convictions under Se....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
