SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
R. K. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Nachiappan – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition had been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to strike off the Plaint in O.S.No. 83 of 2020 on the file of the learned I - Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.
1. This Civil Revision Petition had been filed to strike off the Plaint in O.S.No. 83 of 2020 on the file of the learned I - Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.
2. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the learned District Munsif Court at Salem does not have territorial Jurisdiction, as the place of business is at Tindivanam Taluk. There is a Partnership deed between the Petitioners herein and the Respondents 1 and 2, who are the Partners in the firm Nachiappan & Co. When ever there is any dispute between the Partners, it shall be referred to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute mentioned in the Plaint is to be referred to the Arbitration, as per the Arbitration Clause between the Partners of the Partnership firm Nachiappan & Co. Therefore, the learned District Munsif Court, Salem ought not to have entertained the Suit in O.S.No. 83 of 2020. On that two grounds this Civil Revision Petition is fil
A. Venkatasubbiah Naidu vs. S. Chellappan and Others
Bhatia International vs. Bulk Trading S.A. and Another
Ganapathy Subramanian vs. S. Ramalingam and Others
Kvaerner Cementation India Limited vs. Bajranglal Agarwal and Another
S.R. Nanda Kishore vs. The Body of Villagers, Mambakkam Village and Others
Southern and Rajamani Transport Pvt. Ltd. vs. R. Srinivasan and Others
Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai
The General Manager, Telecommunications, Trichy and Others vs. K. Natrayan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.