M. SUNDAR, M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Arputhan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.Nirmal Kumar, J.
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Sections 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment of the learned XV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chennai passed in S.C.No.203 of 2021 dated 16.12.2022 and acquit the appellant.
The appellant/accused in S.C.No.203 of 2021 on the file of the learned XV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chennai was convicted by judgment dated 16.12.2022 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 307 IPC, further to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 324 IPC and no fine sentence imposed by the Trial Court. Against which, the present appeal is filed.
2. Before the Trial Court, on the side of the prosecution P.W.1 to P.W.10 were examined, Ex.P1 to Ex.P8, M.O.1 and M.O.2 were marked. On the side of the defence, no witnesses examined and no documents marked.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that on 29.06.2020 at about 8.00 a.m., the defacto complainant Rajendran, his wife/P.W.1/Jamuna along with P.W.2/Rani, a neighbour were sitting in front of their house in veranda and were talking, at that time the appellant/accused who i
Arjun Marik v. State of Bihar [1994 Supp (2) SCC 372 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1551]
Lakshmi Singh and others vs. State of Bihar reported in 1976 Supreme(SC) 333
Marudanal Augusti v. State of Kerala [(1980) 4 SCC 425 : 1980 SCC (Cri) 985]
State of Gujarat v. Bai Fatima [(1975) 2 SCC 7 : 1975 SCC (Cri.) 384]
Thulia Kali vs. The State of Tamil Nadu [MANU/SC/0276/1972 : 1973 AIR (SC) 501]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.