IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
R. Henry Paul – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Crl. O.P. No. 14316 of 2021
Decided On : 31-01-2022
Constitution of India , 1949 - Article 21 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 506 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 , 167, 164 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 - Section 17, 6 - First Information Report - Punishment for committing offence of criminal intimidation - Petition has been filed to direct Sessions Judge Special Court for Exclusive Trial receive application filed entertain release petitioner on default bail in Crime respondent Police - Held, Court decision issue whether included or excluded while considering statutory period entitlement of default bail framing questioning of law - Criminal Rules of Practice framed by Court mandates including herein clearly charge sheet not filed petitioner is entitled for statutory bail granted - Criminal Original Petition is allowed
ORDER
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial under POCSO Act, Chennai, to receive the application filed under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., in Crl.M.P.SR.No. 337 of 2021 and entertain the same and release the petitioner on default bail in Crime No. 6 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.
1. This petition has been filed to direct the Sessions Judge Special Court for Exclusive Trial under POCSO Act, Chennai, to receive the application filed under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., in Crl.M.P.SR.No. 337 of 2021 and entertain the same and release the petitioner on default bail in Crime No. 6 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.
2. The petitioner/A2 in Crime No. 6 of 2021, which was registered for the offence under Sections 10 r/w 9(1) (m) (n) and Section 17 of POCSO Act and Section 506(ii) of IPC based on the complaint dated 12.04.2021. The petitioner was arrested on 23.04.2021 and remanded to Judicial Custody on 24.04.2021.
3. The gist of the complaint is that the defacto complainant is a singer by profession and the victim girl is her daughter. Due to her professional requirement, she left her daughter under the care and custody of her sister/A4 from the age of 6 years. While the victim girl was under the care and custody of A4, she was subjected to sexual assault and harassment by A1, who is A4's husband, A2/the petitioner herein, a Pastor in a Church, and A3, relative of A1. The victim was subjected to harassment till the age of 15 years. But A4, the maternal aunt of the victim girl, was a silent spectator. During January 2020, the victim girl unable to bear the sexual assault and harassment informed her mother defacto complainant through neighbour's mobile. Immediately, defacto complainant, the mother of the victim girl, took the victim girl with her. During her stay with her mother, the victim was found uneasy. When she was examined by a psychologist, the victim girl narrated the sexual assault committed on her from the age of six. Based on which, the mother of the victim girl lodged a complaint and a case was registered against the petitioner and 3 others. The petitioner was arrested on 23.04.2021 and remanded on 24.04.2021.
4. The contention of the petitioner is that he moved a bail application in Crl.M.P.No. 459 of 2021 on merits. The Trial Court by order dated 04.05.2021, dismissed the same for the reason statement of the victim girl not yet recorded and the investigation is at the preliminary stage. Thereafter, the petitioner moved a bail application before this Court in Crl.O.P.No. 9099 of 2021. When the case was taken up for hearing, it was reported that the victim girl tested positive for Covid-19 and hence delay in recording 164 Cr.P.C. statement. Later, on 22.06.2021, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. Subsequently, the petitioner filed statutory bail application in Crl.M.P.No. 562 of 2021 under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C since charge sheet was not filed even after expiry of 60 days. Alteration report filed on 25.06.2021 which is on 62nd day. However, the same was dismissed for the reason, offence committed involves Section 6 of POCSO as per 164 Cr.P.C., statement received on 18.06.2021. Thereafter, the petitioner filed second statutory bail application in Crl.MP.SR.No. 337 of 2021 on 22.07.2021, the same was not entertained and returned for the reason that only 89 days completed as on 22.07.2021.
5. In this case, alteration report was filed after filing of the first statutory bail application. The Lower Court relied on the judgment of the Bombay High Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan, wherein it was held that the Court has to apply its mind at every stage from remand till framing of charges. Further, the power of Court is very wide to determine, as to whether the report to be
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right to default bail under section 167 of the CrPC is enforceable only prior to the filing of the charge-sheet and does not survive or re....
Point of Law : Applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the cour....
Application u/s 167(2) Cr.P.C. must be disposed of promptly and such application should not be treated as a regular bail application.
(1) Default bail – Period of 90 days is stated to be counted when investigation for fresh offence(s) is started and not from date of lodging of FIR.(2) Default bail – Right to seek default/statutory ....
The accused's right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. remains enforceable, and the court must promptly decide on bail applications to prevent the prosecution from circumventing this right.
Point of Law : Under subsection (4) of Section 20 TADA read with Section 167 of the Code and the Designated Court shall release him on bail, if the accused seeks to be so released and furnishes the r....
The main legal point established is that the accused has an indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and the NDPS Act, and this right should not be denied due to delays or the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an oral application can be sufficient to release an accused on statutory bail, and the failure to file the final report within the statutory t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.