IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Sri Comanduru Parthasarathy, S/o Late Rajagopalan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No.2802 of 2022
Decided on : 21-04-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 437, 167, 167(2), 267, 270 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections, 107, 424, 427, 418, 421, 403, 406, 409, 411, 413, 414, 420, 468, 120, 120(A), 378, 405, 410, 415, 425, 463, 464, 117, 34 – Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 – 20(4) –Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 –Section 36-A(4) – Quash of criminal Proceeding – Seeking statutory/default bail – Arising out of Crime – Sought enlargement on bail – Para 21.
Finding of the court: Charge sheet is filed against the petitioner – This is plainly contrary to facts, as police filed charge sheet only against accused Nos.3 and 12 as could be seen from order sheet appended to the petition – This fact is undisputed – Contention of learned High Court Government Pleader is that once charge sheet is filed against any of accused other accused also would not be entitled to claim a right under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C – This, on face of it, is unacceptable, as it is fundamentally flawed – It is the case of prosecution itself that matter was pending investigation by police against petitioner/accused No.2. Even this day, it is case of High Court Government Pleader, that case against petitioner is still under investigation and on a plain mathematical calculation petitioner is now in custody for close, twice period of a right under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Results: Criminal Petition is allowed.
ORDER :
The petitioner, in the subject petition, seeks to quash the order dated 29-01-2022 passed by the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.C.No.2423 of 2022 arising out of Crime No.82 of 2021 and has consequently sought enlargement on bail in connection with the aforesaid crime which has been registered under Sections 107, 424, 427, 34, 418, 421, 403, 406, 409, 411, 413, 414, 420, 468, 120, 120(A), 378, 405, 410, 415, 425, 463, 464 and 117 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard Sri.Sandesh Chouta, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri.B.J.Rohith, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent.
3. Sans unnecessary details, facts, in brief, germane for consideration of the issue in the lis are as follows:
4. The petitioner remained in police custody in connection with the crime from 21-10-2021 to 2-11-2021. On 26-10-2021, the petitioner was enlarged on bail by the Court at Hyderabad in connection with Crime No.142 of 2021 registered with Central Crime Station (CCS) at Hyderabad. In the light of release therein, the petitioner filed an application for bail under Section 437 of the Cr.P.C. in Crime No.82 of 2021. On the day of the application, the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody in terms of an order passed by the learned Magistrate and was placed at the Central Jail. The body warrant of the petitioner was further extended till 15-11-2021 by the learned Magistrate.
5. Objections were filed to the bail application filed under Section 437 of the Cr.P.C by the petitioner on 2-11-2021. Pending consideration of enlargement of the petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.82 of 2021 at Bangalore, the Court at Hyderabad enlarges the petitioner on default bail in connection with another crime in Crime No.100 of 2021 owing to non-filing of charge sheet by the Police. At Bengaluru, the body warrant of the petitioner was further extended by the learned Magistrate till 28-12-2021. All these happened during the pendency of investigation by the Police at Bengaluru in Crime No.82 of 2021.
6. A preliminary charge sheet against accused Nos. 3 and 12 in connection with Crime No.82 of 2021 was filed by the Police on 18-12-2021 but no charge sheet was filed against the petitioner. On 20-01-2022 the period of 90 days from the date on which the petitioner was arrested expired. On the 95th day the petitioner files an application under Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C seeking statutory/default bail in connection with Crime No.82 of 2021 on the ground that no charge sheet was filed against him by the police in the aforesaid crime. The same was objected to by the State. Considering the application filed under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. an order is passed by the learned Magistrate on 29-01-2022 rejecting the statutory bail. On 23-03-2022 another order is passed rejecting regular bail application also fi
Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra
BIKRAMJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB {(2020) 10 SCC 616}
Chaganti Satyanarayana and others v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi v. Anupama J.Kulkarni
Hussainara Khatoon (4) v. State of Bihar
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
Mohd. Iqbal Madar Sheikh v. State of Maharashtra
M.RAVINDRAN v. DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE {(2021) 2 SCC 485}
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.