Karthikeyan vs State rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Palladam

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1037

N. ANAND VENKATESH
Karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Palladam – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.Natarajan, SC for Mr.C.P.Palanichamy
For the Respondent: Mr.L.Baskaran, GA

JUDGMENT :

This criminal appeal has been filed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Neethimandram (FTMC), Tirupur District in S.C.No.54 of 2012, dated 25.8.2014, convicting and sentencing the appellant in the following manner:

S. No.	Offence for which convicted	Sentence imposed
1	Section 306 of the Code	7 years R.I., and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, to undergo 1 year R.I.
2	Section 498-A of the Code	3 years R.I., and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default, to undergo 6 months R.I.
The above sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. The case of the prosecution is as hereunder :

(i) On 16.9.2007, the appellant (A1) married one Suganthi (since deceased). Accused Nos.2 and 3 are the parents of the appellant. Suganthi was differently abled and this fact was known to the appellant even at the time of marriage. Three months after the marriage, the appellant and Suganthi started living at Ganapathipalayam.

(ii) The appellant and his parents caused cruelty to Suganthi by asking her to get

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1037

N. ANAND VENKATESHKarthikeyan – AppellantVersusState rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Palladam – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

N. ANAND VENKATESH
Karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Palladam – Respondent