Back
S. SOUNTHAR
Mary Amitharaj – Appellant
Versus
V. George Peter – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[PRAYER:- Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed by the Court of the Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivillputhur in A.S.No.02 of 2012 on 30.10.2013 in reversing the well considered Judgment and Decree passed by the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur in O.S.No.310 of 1996 on 30.09.2011 and allow this Second Appeal.
PRAYER:- Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the judgment and decree in A.S.No.2 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivillputhur dated 30.10.2013 reversing the judgement and decree in O.S.No.310 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur dated 30.09.2011.]
These Second Appeals are arising out of judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.2 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur reversing the decree for partition granted by the Trial Court in O.S.No.310 of 1996 on the file of Sub Court, Srivilliputhur.
2. The parties are referred in this judgment as per their ranking in Second Appeal in S.A.(MD).No.193 of
The validity of a Will can be upheld despite procedural omissions if supported by sufficient evidence, and a partition suit may be dismissed if barred by limitation.
The propounder of a Will must prove its execution and attestation in accordance with law, and any suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will must be dispelled for it to be considered valid.
The burden to prove the execution of a Will and the free will of the testator lies on the propounder. The propounder must establish attestation and remove suspicious circumstances affecting the genui....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the execution of a Will in compliance with legal provisions and the consideration of suspicious circumstances surroundi....
The court emphasized that the burden of proof lies on the propounder of a Will, especially when suspicious circumstances exist, necessitating clear evidence of its validity.
The burden of proof for the execution of a Will lies with the propounder, who must establish compliance with statutory requirements, including the testimony of attesting witnesses.
The court established that a Will must comply with statutory requirements to be considered valid, emphasizing the importance of proper attestation and execution.
The burden to prove the validity of a Will lies with the propounder, and failure to meet statutory requirements results in its invalidation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
