SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1273

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. ILANGOVAN, J.
M. Kalidass – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Theni & Another – Respondents
W.P(MD)No. 4814 of 2023
Decided On : 07-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:J. Krishna Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: B. Nambiselvan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

The court emphasized the importance of considering representations for conducting cultural programs in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Director General of Police.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Cultural Program Permission - The court directed the second respondent to consider the representation of the writ petitioner and pass suitable orders based on the circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform a cultural program on a specific date and time. The second respondent had not considered the representation of the writ petitioner, leading to the filing of the petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the second respondent to consider the representation of the writ petitioner and pass suitable orders based on the circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police.

Issues: Permission for conducting a cultural program and necessary protection.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the circular memorandum issued by the Director General of Police, which provided guidelines for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programs.

Final Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of with the direction for the second respondent to consider the representation of the writ petitioner and pass suitable orders based on the circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural program (i.e) Adal Padal on 11.03.2023 at 07.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m., in the evening of “Lakshmi Narasing Perumal Kovil Thiruvizha”, Gandhi Nagar, Thappukundu, Theni District, consider the petitioner''s representation dated 28.02.2023.)

1. The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural program (i.e) Adal Padal on 11.03.2023 at 07.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m., in the evening of “Lakshmi Narasing Perumal Kovil Thiruvizha”, Gandhi Nagar, Thappukundu, Theni District, consider the petitioner''s representation dated 28.02.2023.

2. Mr. B.Nambiselvan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that festival for the temple, by name, “Lakshmi Narasing Perumal Kovil Thiruvizha” situated at Gandhi Nagar, Thappukundu, Theni District, is going to be held on 11.03.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 11.03.2023, they sought permission of the Police by giving a representation dated 28.02.2023. But, the second respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that he has no objection for granting permission to conduct a cultural programme subject to time restriction in between 07.00 p.m to 10.00 p.m. on 11.03.2023, and also submitted that the second respondent has received the representation of the writ petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 28.02.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular, in the light of the above submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top