Back
G. JAYACHANDRAN
K. Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
State rep by Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the conviction imposed in the judgment dated 12.04.2019 made in C.A.No.77 of 2018 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore modifying the judgmet dated 01.02.2018 made in C.C.C.no.148 of 2016 on the fie of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court Level-II, Coimbatore by allowing this Criminal Revision Petition.)
1. This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court Level-II, Coimbatore and confirmed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore. As far as the sentence is concerned, the trial Court imposed one year SI and compensation of Rs.1,20,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% payable to the complainant. The lower appellate Court modified the sentence from one year SI to three months SI and confirmed the order of compensation passed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by that, the present Criminal Revision Case has been filed.
2. The brief facts of the case leading to the revision petition is that, the revision petitioner/accused
The main legal point established is that the drawer of a cheque cannot take advantage of their own fault and must comply with the legal requirements under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Ac....
The compensatory nature of proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act and the court's authority to modify the sentence and compensation amount based on relevant legal provisions.
The main legal point established is that the Appellate Court cannot enhance the sentence by ordering compensation in the absence of an appeal by the complainant.
The compensatory nature of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the recoverability of compensation even after default sentence as provided in Section 357(3), 421, and 4....
The compensatory nature of proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act and the recoverability of compensation under Section 421 of Cr.P.C were central to the court's decision.
The presumption of liability under Sec. 139 of the NI Act favors the complainant and must be rebutted by the accused.
A revisional court shall not interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless they suffer from perversity or illegality; furthermore, a notice returned as 'unclaimed' to the correct address is presu....
The court confirmed that the burden of proof shifts to the accused to rebut the statutory presumptions once the complainant establishes a prima facie case under the N.I. Act.
The presumption of a debt under Sec. 139 of the N.I. Act is a significant legal principle, which places the burden on the accused to prove the contrary when a cheque is dishonored.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
