SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1388

J. NISHA BANU
A. Kumaresan – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Salem – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:P.M. Subramaniam, M/s. S. Girija, Advocates. For the Respondent:R2, S. Ilamvaludhi, Advocate. R1, Court.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent connected with I.D.No.32 of 2002 dated 04.12.2002 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner with full back-wages into the service of the second respondent with all attendant benefits.)

1. Seeking to quash the order passed by the first respondent in I.D.No.32 of 2002, dated 04.12.2002 and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner with full back-wages into the service of the second respondent with all attendant benefits, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner was appointed as ''Driver'' on ''daily wage basis'' on 05.09.1992 in Anna Sathya Transport Corporation, Dharmapuri, now called as T.N.State Transport Corporation Division. On 01.07.1993, the petitioner was made permanent and while in duty, the petitioner was unauthorizedly absent on 06.10.1997 and from 20.10.1997, for which he was issued with a charge memo on 17.11.1997 by the respondent Corporation. Fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top