SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1714

RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
M. Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
G. Pasupathy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ganesh Rajan, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Arivazhagan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai made in C.A.No.318 of 2017, dated 28.09.2018, confirming the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-III, Saidapet, Chennai in C.C.No.5804 of 2006, by judgment dated 05.09.2017.)

1. The complainant is the revision petitioner herein.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the ranking before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts of this case is as follows:-

(a) The petitioner herein had filed a private complaint as against the respondent for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the same had been taken on file by the learned XVII Metropolitan Magistrate in C.C.No.5804 of 2006 and later had been transferred to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-III, Saidapet, Chennai.

(b) The petitioner and the respondent were good friends for quite a long time and the respondent had approached the petitioner and represented that he intend to sell his property situated at Thanjavur and the respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top