SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1755

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
C.Md. Musadiquiddin & Another – Appellants
Versus
Sayeedunissa Begum – Respondent
CRL. O.P. No. 10269 of 2023 & Crl. M.P. No. 6669 of 2023
Decided On : 05-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Sharath P. Nair, Advocate

The decision highlights the importance of timely and efficient conduct of legal proceedings, including cross-examination and argumentation.

Headnote:

Negotiable Instruments Act - Recall of Witness - The court dismissed the petition to recall the witness for further cross-examination, allowing the petitioners to argue the case without filing any application and complete the arguments by a specified date.

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed to set aside the order passed by the Court below in a complaint lodged for the offences under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioners sought to recall the witness for further cross-examination when the matter was posted for arguments.

Finding of the Court:

The Court dismissed the petition to recall the witness and permitted the petitioners to argue the case without filing any application, setting a deadline for completing the arguments.

Issues: The main issue was the petitioners' request to recall the witness for further cross-examination and the request for additional time to argue the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the fact that the witness had already been fully cross-examined, and the petitioners' request for additional time to argue the case.

Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was disposed of, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 16.03.2023 in C.M.P.No.4381 of 2023 in C.C.No.1387 of 2021 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and to set aside the same.)

1. This petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 16.03.2023 in C.M.P.No.4381 of 2023 in C.C.No.1387 of 2021 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and to set aside the same.

2. This petition has been filed to set aside the order passed by the Court below in Crl.M.P.No.4381 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No.10269 of 2023, thereby the petition filed under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was dismissed.

3. It is seen from the records that the petitioners A1 & A2 in the complaint lodged by the respondent for the offences under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Acts, 1881.

4. The respondent, was examined as P.W.1. P.W.1 was fully cross-examined by the petitioners. Again, by way of present application, they filed a petition to recall P.W.1 for further cross-examination that too, when the matter is posted for arguments, and the Court below rightly dismissed the petition.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter is today posted for arguments and he seeks further two weeks'' time to argue the matter.

6. Considering the said request, the petitioners are permitted to argue the case without filing any application and complete the arguments on or before 15.05.2023.

7. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top