SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2022

G. JAYACHANDRAN
R. Chandrasekaran – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Baskar, Advocate. For the Respondent: K. Srinivasan, Senior Counsel Special Public Prosecutor (C.B.I).

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., pleased to set aside the order of conviction passed by the Learned XI Additional Special Judge (CBI Cases relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai, passed in C.C.No.54 of 2004, dated 21.12.2012 and acquit the appellant.)

1. The appellant herein, is the accused in C.C.No.54 of 2004 on the file of the XI Additional Special Judge (CBI Cases Relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai.

2. Based on the reliable information received at the office of the Superintendent of Police, CBI ACB, Chennai a case was registered against the appellant for the offences of criminal conspiracy with unknown persons to cheat Indian Bank and its depositors and in pursuant to the conspiracy committed various illegal acts such as forgery, using forged documents as genuine and criminal misconduct of a public servant.

3. After completion of investigation, it was found that FDR''s in respect of 9 deposits were forged and from those deposits, loans sanctioned fraudulently using forged documents as genuine to d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top