IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, JJ.
The Deputy Commissioner Chennai & Others – Appellants
Versus
Nikhilesh Gowthamaprabu Represented by his Natural Guardian & father Gowthamprabu & Others – Respondents
W.A. Nos. 1430, 1104, 1427, 1423, 1428, 1432, 1178 & 1179 of 2023 & C.M.P. Nos. 11173, 13924, 13932, 13918, 13892, 13915, 11974 & 11978 of 2023
Decided On : 25-07-2023
Compartment Examination - Promotion to Class XII - CBSE - Class XI - 33% Marks - Supplementary Examination - Equal Treatment - Article 14
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, students in Class XI, failed in more than one subject and sought direction for the conduct of compartment/supplementary examination to be promoted to Class XII. The court directed the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan to conduct supplementary examination for all students who failed in more than one subject to enable them to be promoted to Class XII.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the rules mandated pass in all subjects in Class XI for promotion to Class XII. It found that the refusal to extend the benefit of supplementary examination to students who failed in more than one subject was not discriminatory and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The court set aside the order directing the conduct of supplementary examination and dismissed the writ petitions.
Issues: The issues involved the promotion of students from Class XI to Class XII, the conduct of compartment/supplementary examination, and the application of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the rules requiring pass in all subjects for promotion to Class XII were mandatory and that the refusal to extend the benefit of supplementary examination to students who failed in more than one subject was not discriminatory. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the prescribed norms for maintaining proper standards of education.
Final Decision: The common order directing the conduct of supplementary examination for students who failed in more than one subject was set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed. The writ appeals were allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed with no costs.
JUDGMENT
(Prayers:- Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12977 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 11590 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12979 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12971 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12981 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12981 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 13481 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.
Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12985 of 2023 by the learned Single Judge.)
Common judgment
P.D. Audikesavalu, J.
1. These intra-Court appeals invoking Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865, arise out of the common order dated 27.04.2023 in W.P. Nos. 13481, 11590, 12971, 12977, 12979, 12981, 12982 and 12985 of 2023 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court.
2. The parties are hereinafter referred as per their description in the said Writ Petitions for the sake of clarity and convenience.
3. The Petitioners had joined as students in Class XI for the academic year 2022-2023 in the schools at Ashok Nagar and Anna Nagar in Chennai City of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, which are governed by the Central Board Secondary Education (hereinafter referred to as ''CBSE'' for short) pattern of School Education. Clause 7.5 of Bye-Laws of CBSE stipulates that admission to Class XII in a school shall be open to such a student, who has completed a regular course of study for Class XI and has passed Class XI examination from an institution affiliated to CBSE. In Clause 40.2(ii) of Examination Bye-Laws of CBSE, as amended in the notification dated 29.11.2016, it has been prescribed as follows:-
“A candidate failing in one of the five subjects of external examination at Class XI shall be placed in Compartment in that subject provided he/she qualifies in all the subjects of internal assessment.”
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan had by letter in F.110362/02/2017- 18/KVS(Acad)/CBSE Result dated 05.06.2018 conveyed the decision taken in the 109th meeting of its Board of Governors held on 06.03.2018 amending Article 105 and 106 of the Examination and Promotion Rules of the Education Code, in which it has been provided as follows:-
“Class XI
1. The qualifying marks in each subject of external examination shall be 33%. However, in a subject involving practical/project work, a candidate must obtain 33% marks in the practical/project separately in addition to 33% marks in aggregate, in order to qualify in that subject.
2. In order to be declared as having passed the Class XI Examination, a candidate shall obtain 33% marks in all the subjects (without additional subject). The pass marks in each subject of examination shall be 33%. In case of subject involving practical/project work a candidate must obtain 33% in practical/project separately in additional to 33% marks in aggregate in order to qualify in that subject.
3. A candidate failing in one of the five subjects of examination at Class XI shall be placed in Compartment in that subject provided he/she qualifies in all the subjects of internal assessment (As per CBSE Examination Byelaws Notification dated 29.11.2016 regarding Additions/ Amendments in Examination Bye-Law
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rules mandating pass in all subjects in Class XI for promotion to Class XII were found to be mandatory and not discriminatory, thereby uph....
In case of conflict, CBSE Bye-Laws prevail over KVS Education Code, and the court interpreted and applied Bye-Law 40.1 to allow the substitution of subjects for promotion.
Promotion from Class XI to Class XII must adhere to established criteria; negative equality cannot be claimed based on prior mistakes.
The regulation compelling heads of schools to submit all candidates for examination, irrespective of their academic progress, is invalid as it undermines educational standards and the internal autono....
The retrospective application of policy changes by an authority must respect established rights and expectations of stakeholders, particularly in education, to prevent arbitrary and unjust outcomes.
Prescribing the academic standards falls exclusively in the domain of special bodies like the Senate, Board of Governors and Syndicate etc. The court would normally not interfere with such prescribed....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.