Selvam vs Muniappan - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 2290

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2290

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Selvam – Appellant
Versus
Muniappan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Govindaraj, Advocate. For the Respondent: R1, Party-in-person For R2, R3, R4, R6 & R8, No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayerin C.M.P.:- This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 26 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition.

in C.R.P.:- The Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the impugned fair and decreetal order dated 04.11.2022 made in E.A.No.17 of 2021 in E.P.No.17 of 2015 in O.S.No.161 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivagangai and set aside the same.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner to condone the delay of 26 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition.

2. The above Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner against the fair and decreetal order dated 04.11.2022 passed by the District Munsif Court, Sivagangai in E.A.No.17 of 2021 in E.P.No.17 of 2015 in O.S.No.161 of 2007.

3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner filed an application under Order 21 Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 which was dismissed by the Executing Court without considering the objections made by the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document