SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 253

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Rani – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmiammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Udaya Kumar (in both C.R.Ps).
For the Respondent: Mr. K. Thenrajan (in both C.R.Ps).

ORDER :

Prayer in C.R.P.No.3182 of 2022: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the impugned common Fair Order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.No.257 of 2010 dated 21.04.2022 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Maduranthakam.

Prayer in C.R.P.No.3184 of 2022: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the impugned common Fair Order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2020 in O.S.No.257 of 2010 dated 21.04.2022 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Maduranthakam.

These civil revision petitions are filed to set aside the common order and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2020 and I.A.No.3 of 2020 in O.S.No,257 of 2010 dated 21.04.2022.

2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff instituted a Suit for bar injunction. The Suit was dismissed for default on 13.11.2013. However, no application was filed to restore the Suit within the time limit and there was an enormous delay in filing an application to set aside the order passed by the Trial Court dismissing the Suit for default on 13.11.2013. Therefore, the revision petitioner filed I.A.No.1 of 2020 to condone the delay of 1495 day

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top