Back
G. JAYACHANDRAN
V. Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, BS & FC, CBI, Bangalore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and charges framed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of conspiracy and financial misconduct. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. allegations against directors of various companies. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. evidence indicating fraudulent activity. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. processing and result of loan claims. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. arguments concerning trial procedure. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. defendants’ defense arguments. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. defense regarding settlements and charges. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. prosecution's stand on conspiracy and complicity. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 10. court's ruling on specific appeals and evidence. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. final conclusion on appeals. (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. final orders regarding appeals. (Para 50) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayers: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai and made in C.C.No.55 of 2000 by judgment dated 23.10.2013.
Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment dated 23.10.201
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
