SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. NISHA BANU, N. MALA, JJ.
V. Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee – III, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 4484 of 2021 & W.M.P. Nos. 5110 & 5116 of 2021
Decided On : 24-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:N. Naganathan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, P. Gurunathan, Addl. Government Pleader, R2 & R3, S.B. Keerthana, for M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co. Advocates.

The importance of constitutional norms and the goal of achieving an egalitarian society.

Headnote:

Caste Certificate - Scheduled Tribe Reservation - 1995 AIR 94, 1995 AIR SC 94, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 782 - The court discussed the issue of false caste certificates and the principles of natural justice. It referred to the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Kumari Madhuri Patil vs Addl. Commissioner and the O.M. dated 24.12.2020 of the Lok Sabha Secretariat, which stipulated guidelines for verification of caste certificates for reservations. The court held that the O.M. did not debar the scrutiny committee from verifying certificates issued before 1995 and emphasized that fraud vitiates everything. It also highlighted the importance of constitutional norms and the goal of achieving an egalitarian society.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, appointed under the Scheduled Tribe quota, challenged the cancellation of his community certificate. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove his Scheduled Tribe status and exhibited suspicious conduct.

Finding of the Court:

The court found no violation of natural justice and confirmed the cancellation of the petitioner's community certificate. It emphasized the importance of constitutional norms and the goal of achieving an egalitarian society.

Issues: Violation of natural justice, jurisdiction of the scrutiny committee, and fraudulent conduct of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner failed to prove his Scheduled Tribe status and exhibited suspicious conduct. It emphasized the importance of constitutional norms and the goal of achieving an egalitarian society.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the impugned order dated 24.12.2020 was confirmed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the proceedings of the first respondent i.e. Tamil Nad State Level Scrutiny Committee dated 24.12.2020 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to continue to pay the provisional pension to the petitioner.)

J. Nisha Banu, J.

1. Heard the counsels for both sides.

2. The issue involved, in brief, is that the petitioner got appointed to Bank of Baroda in the year 1989, under reservation category, earmarked for Scheduled Tribes. He had presented a caste certificate issued by Tahsildar, Attur as ''Hindu Kaatunayakam'' community belonging to the Scheduled Tribe. Until 2015, there had been no problem and thereafter, the Bank of Baroda filed W.P.No.8573 of 2015 before this Court. This Court disposed of the petition directing the State Level Enquiry Committee to conduct enquiry and pass orders on merit.

3. Even when the proceeding was pending, the petitioner attained superannuation on 31.12.2018. The terminal benefits including pension, leave encashment, commutation etc. were not paid. Therefore, the petitioner filed W.P.No.7490 of 2019 before this Court. This Court, disposed of the petition, by directing Bank of Baroda to consider the claim of the petitioner herein, on merits, after providing due opportunity of hearing the petitioner.

4. In compliance of the above order of this Court, the petitioner was given an opportunity and he had put forth his case before the respondent Bank on 09.09.2019. Thereafter, the respondent Bank issued a letter, dated 23.09.2019, enclosing the minutes of personal hearing held on 09.09.2019. In the letter, they stated that they are following up with the Committee and stated that the petitioner may also follow up with the Committee. The request to pay gratuity was also repelled by the respondent Bank, citing an order of this Court, which got eventually overturned by the Hon''ble Supreme Court.

5. As the respondent Bank could not pass orders as directed by this Court in order dated 29.03.2019 in W.P.No.7490 of 2019, the petitioner filed a 3rd writ petition in W.P.No.34794 of 2019 before this Court for issue of writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Bank to disburse all retirement monetary benefits, including pension etc. and that petition is still pending.

6. Thereafter, vide proceeding No.7551/CV-5/2015-12 dated 24.12.2020, the State Level Committee found his caste certificate false and withdrew his certificate. It refused to consider the adjournment of hearings sought by the petitioner on health/COVID grounds. It held that he belonged to ''Hindu Man ottar community'' and not ''Hindu Kaatunayakken community''. Now, the petitioner fears that along with the retirement benefits that accrued out of his services, his provisional pension could also be stopped. Therefore, he filed this Writ Petition to quash the order of the State Level Committee, mainly on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice as he was not provided with effective opportunity to produce evidences to defend his case. He had also sought to stay the order pending disposal of this writ petition.

7. The menace of unscrupulous individuals manoeuvring the system to obtain false caste certificates and securing admissions to education institutions and employment in Government and public sectors effectively depriving the constitutional rights of deserving communities had been a challenge for public administration for many reasons. The fact that very often, the applications for community certificates are moved by parents/guardians when the beneficiaries are still minors, compounds the problem. The complexity of the best known methods and the enormity of time in probing the anthropological roots of the individuals to determine their caste/community adds up to the challenge. This lead to courts taking varying decisions at varying points of time on matters of admissions and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top