SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1812

L. VICTORIA GOWRI
Chinnaiah – Appellant
Versus
Valliammal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:G. Karnan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, P. Vadivel, Advocate, R2 to R15, No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in memo dated 04.09.2015 filed by the plaintiff / first respondent in O.S.No.172 of 2010 on the file of the I Additional District Judge (PCR), Thanjavur.)

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order passed in Memo dated 04.09.2015 filed by the plaintiff / first respondent in O.S.No.172 of 2010 on the file of the I Additional District Judge (PCR), Thanjavur. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as arrayed in O.S.No. 172 of 2010.

2. The revision petitioner herein is the fourth defendant in the said Memo. The suit in O.S.No.172 of 2010 was one for partition. After the filing of proof affidavit of examination-in-chief by the third defendant, a Memo was filed by the first respondent / petitioner / plaintiff stating that, the ''third defendant'' is the wife of the fourth defendant. Though they have filed separate written statements, they have no conflicting interest adverse to each other. They do not make any claim against each other as well. The written statement filed by both of them are one and the same and in the said cir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top