Back
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Chennai, – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Export, Coimbatore – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayerin O.P.No.780 of 2017: Original Petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to set the award passed by the learned Arbitrator, dated 29.09.2015 in Arbitration Case No.13 of 2011/SV followed by the additional award dated 20.06.2017 in Arbitration case No.01/2017 SV.
in O.P.No.927 of 2017: Original Petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to set the award passed by the learned Arbitrator, dated 29.09.2015 in Arbitration Case No.04/2011/SV followed by the additional award dated 28.08.2017 in Arbitration case No.02/2017 SV.)
Common Order:
1. Original petition No.780 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, ''the Act''), praying to set aside the award passed by the learned Arbitrator, dated 29.09.2015 in Arbitration Case No.13 of 2011/SV followed by the additional award dated 20.06.2017 in Arbtration case No.01/2017 SV.
Original petition No.780 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner, praying to set aside the award passed by the learned Arbitrator, dated 29.09.2015 in Arbitration Case No.04/
Scanned signed copy of the award/order of the Arbitral Tribunal to the parties would be a valid delivery as envisaged under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The learned Arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction in reviewing the Original Award under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
An application under Section 33 for correction of an arbitral award cannot extend the limitation period for challenging that award under Section 34 if it seeks a substantive review.
The court confirmed that arbitral awards can only be set aside under specific grounds outlined in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, affirming the validity of the arbitrator's decision regarding l....
The court upheld limitations on condonation applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines.
The dismissal of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act was justified due to the petitioner's failure to meet limitation requirements, as procedural defects impeded timely filing.
The limitation period for setting aside an arbitral award starts from the disposal of a request under Section 33, excluding the time taken for communication of that decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
