SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1883

V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
B. Suseela – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Rangarao (Died) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:T. Srinivasaraghavan, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Dasaratha Rao, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 26.06.2015 passed in O.S.No.9556 of 2010 on the file of the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.)

1. The present Revision has been filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 26.06.2015 passed in O.S.No.9556 of 2010 on the file of the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The appellant is the defendant in O.S.No.9556 of 2010 and A.P.Rangarao and A.Mukundiah who were deceased had filed O.S.No.9556 of 2010 to direct the appellant / defendant to deliver possession of the suit property described in the schedule after removing the superstructure illegally put by the appellant / defendant and if she fails to do so, sought a direction to remove the superstructure at plaintiffs'' cost and recover it from the defendant and to pay Rs.18,000/- towards damages and continue to pay at Rs.500/- p.m., till date of delivery of possession. The present respondent, viz., Sathyavathi, is the legal heir of A.P.Rangarao. The written statement was filed by the appellant / defendant. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top