Back
N. ANAND VENKATESH
Vijay Pharamaceuticals Rep. by its Power of Attorney Holder M. Ranganathan, Krishnagiri – Appellant
Versus
Chairman cum Managing Director, Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd, (SIDCO), Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned re-allotment order of the respondents 1 and 2 in Proceeding No.28967/DA1/87 dated 18.09.1987 and handing over proceedings in No. 28967/DA1/87 dated 30.09.1987, to quash the same as illegal, incompetent and ultra vires and consequently directing the respondents 1 and 2 to allot the Plot A-1 to the original allottee i.e., the petitioner Firm M/s.Vijay Pharmaceuticals and also direct to approve the building and planning permission for the construction of factory building in Plot A-1, Industrial Estate, SIDCO, Hosur, Krishnagiri Distict.)
1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned re-allotment order passed by the SIDCO in favour of the 3rd respondent and for a consequential direction to SIDCO to allot the subject property in favour of the petitioner.
2. Heard Mr.V.Karthic, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.B.Anand Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.J.Melwin Jabaz, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
The court emphasized that failure to comply with payment directives, as mandated by public notice, results in cancellation of allotment, and timely action to enforce rights is critically important.
The withdrawal of an earlier writ petition with liberty to pursue other legal remedies does not entitle the petitioner to file a second writ petition challenging the same impugned order after a signi....
Failure to commence production within stipulated time or seek extension justifies plot allotment cancellation after prolonged delay.
When an allotment condition requires construction to commence within a specified period from the date of allotment, but the grantor delays handing over possession, the limitation period for performan....
The importance of exercising vested rights within the specified time frame and the authority's discretion in cancellation of allotment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
