SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1934

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Subramani – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:B. Jawahar, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Suseela Devi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and final order dated 11.10.2022 made in I.A.no.296 of 2021 in O.S.No.26 of 2017 passed by the Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai.)

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners/defendants challenging the fair and final order dated 11.10.2022 made in I.A.No.296 of 2021 in O.S.No.26 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai.

2. According to the petitioners, the respondent has filed a suit in O.S.No.26 of 2017 for recovery of possession. In the said suit, the petitioners/defendants were set exparte on 03.07.2019 and an exparte decree was passed accordingly. The contention of the petitioners is that they were not aware of the exparte decree and only at the time of receiving notice in E.P.No.2 of 2020, they came to know about the exparte decree passed in the above suit.

3. In the affidavit, the petitioners have stated that the first petitioner was suffering from Jaundice and he was the only person taking care of the case and because of his ailment he was unable to appear before the Trial Court. Hence, his absence was no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top