SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2149

J. NISHA BANU
Kannagi – Appellant
Versus
Gubendiran – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:B. Jawahar, Advocate. For the Respondent: No Appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 27.06.2014 made in I.A.No.503 of 2013 in O.S.No.89 of 2011 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.)

1. Against the dismissal of the petition to condone the delay of 123 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the third defendant.

2. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for partition against the revision petitioner / 3rd defendant and others. The suit was posted on 11.02.2013 for filing written statement by the revision petitioner. On the said date, the revision petitioner neither appeared nor filed written statement and therefore, she was set ex parte on the same day. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application to set aside the ex parte decree along with a delay of 123 days. The trial Court declined to condone the delay, against which, the third defendant has filed the present Civil Revision Petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was suffering from jaundi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top