IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Anuradha Moturi – Appellant
Versus
State by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chennai & Another – Respondents
Criminal Original Petition No. 15690 of 2022 & Crl.M.P. Nos. 8817 & 12885 of 2022
Decided On : 01-09-2023
Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Registration Act, 1908, Section 83 - Criminal Procedure Code - The court quashed the first information report in Crime No.19 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent in favor of the petitioner (A2) after finding that none of the offenses were made out against the petitioner and the continuation of the criminal proceedings would result in an abuse of process of law. The court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the first information report pending investigation, alleging that she was falsely implicated in a case involving a disputed property. The petitioner, who had migrated to the USA in 1991, was accused of being involved in fraudulent property transactions that took place in India between 2002 and 2005.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no material to substantiate the allegations against the petitioner. It noted that the petitioner had been living in the USA until 2011 and had no involvement in the disputed property transactions. The court concluded that the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the petitioner would amount to an abuse of process of law.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's involvement in the disputed property transactions was substantiated and whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner should be quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there were no materials to show the petitioner's involvement in the fraudulent property transactions. It emphasized that the petitioner had been living in the USA during the relevant period and had no connection to the disputed transactions. The court invoked its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the proceedings against the petitioner.
Final Decision: The court quashed the first information report in Crime No.19 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent in favor of the petitioner (A2) and allowed the criminal original petition. The connected Crl.M.Ps. were closed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: PETITION under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records and quash the proceedings as against the petitioner in Crime No.19 of 2022 dated 05.3.2022 on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, CCB-II, Central Crime Branch, Chennai.)
1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the first information report pending investigation on the file of the first respondent in Crime No.19 of 2022.
2. The facts leading to filing of this petition are stated as hereunder:
(i) One late Dr.Moturi Sathyanarayana - the father of the second respondent, was the owner of the subject property measuring approximately four acres. The said late Dr.Moturi Sathyanarayana had executed a registered will dated 20.5.1983 bequeathing the subject property in favour of three of his grand children. He nominated two of his sons as administrators. As per the said registered will, out of the total extent of 4 acres, an extent of 1.5 acres each was given to two grandsons and an extent of 1 acre was given to the granddaughter, who is none other than the petitioner herein.
(ii) One late Mr.M.K.Mohan, who was none other than the brother of the second respondent and the son of the said late Dr.Moturi Sathyanarayana, created a fabricated will dated 04.3.1995 and forged the signature of the said late Dr.Moturi Sathyanarayana as if the entire property was bequeathed in his favour. Based on the said fabricated will dated 04.3.1995, the said late Mr.M.K.Mohan executed a gift deed dated 01.2.2002 in favour of one Mrs.Lalitha Mohan (A1), who is none other than the wife of the said late Mr.M.K.Mohan.
(iii) Later, A1 and the said late Mr.M.K.Mohan dealt with an extent of 42 cents and another extent of 3.05 acres out of the total property and sold them into two portions in the year 2004 and 2005 in favour of one Mr.S.Venkatesh (A4) and one Mrs.P.Usha (A3) respectively.
(iv) In 2005, the second respondent instituted proceedings to probate the will dated 20.5.1983. Since it was contested, it was converted into T.O.S.No.73 of 2013 before this Court. The said testamentary original suit was decreed on 30.1.2018, the will dated 20.5.1983 was found to be genuine and the letters of administration was granted. This judgment was subsequently confirmed in appeal in O.S.A.No.19 of 2019 by judgment dated 17.2.2020.
(v) Further, proceedings were initiated by the second respondent before the authorities concerned for cancellation of the settlement deed dated 01.2.2002 executed in favour of A1 by the said late Mr.M.K.Mohan and the sale deeds that were executed in favour of A4 and A3 by A1 and the said late Mr.M.K.Mohan respectively in the years 2004 and 2005. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Chennai Region, through proceedings dated 17.2.2021, cancelled registration of those documents since they were based on a fabricated will. He also recommended to the Sub-Registrar, Kundrathur for initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 83 of the Registration Act.
(vi) In addition to that, the second respondent filed a writ petition before this Court in W.P.No.15867 of 2021 seeking a direction to (ii) the Commissioner of Police, Chennai-7; (ii) the Additional Commissioner of Police, City Crime Branch, Chennai-7; and (iii) the Inspector of Police, Team XXIV, City Crime Branch, Chennai-7 to implement the proceedings initiated by the Sub-Registrar, Kundrathur dated 09.03.2021 at the earliest point of time. This writ petition came to be disposed of by this Court by an order dated 06.12.2021 directing the respondent - police to register the first information report, conduct investigation and file a final report within a period of six months.
(vii) Pursuant to the said order of this Court dated 06.12.2021, the first information report was registered in Crime No.19 of 2022. Challenging the same, the petitioner (
AI
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash criminal proceedings when it finds that the contin....
The main legal point established is the need for a fair and thorough investigation in cases involving property disputes and allegations of fraudulent activities.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of conflicting Wills and their implications on property rights, along with the application of relevant provisions of the Code....
Forgery – Purchaser of property which was acquired through a forged Will, cannot be held criminally liable for offence of forgery.
Criminal proceedings cannot be used as a tool of harassment when civil remedies exist and have been adjudicated upon.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.