SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2837

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
D. NAGARJUN, J.
G. Murali Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi & 0thers – Respondent
W.P. (MD) No. 22378 of 2023
Decided On : 15-09-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R.J. Karthick, Advocate. For the Respondents:B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate.

The right to worship and the promotion of harmony among different religious groups.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Religious Festival Permission - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court examines the right to worship and the importance of promoting harmony among different religious groups. The court considers the previous incidents and permissions granted by the Revenue Divisional Officer. The court emphasizes the right to worship and the need for harmony among different religious groups. The court directs the petitioner to file a fresh application for permission, which the police should grant with conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner seeks permission to conduct the Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival at Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple. The festival was previously not granted permission due to certain incidents in the area. The petitioner is willing to abide by any conditions imposed by the police. The respondents argue that granting permission may create a law and order problem. The Revenue Divisional Officer has granted permission to other groups in the same town. The court emphasizes the right to worship and promotes harmony among different religious groups. The court directs the petitioner to file a fresh application for permission, which the police should grant with conditions.

Finding of the Court:

The court considers the arguments of both parties and examines the previous incidents and permissions granted by the Revenue Divisional Officer. The court emphasizes the right to worship and the importance of promoting harmony among different religious groups.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decides that the petitioner should be granted permission to conduct the festival, as long as they abide by the conditions imposed by the police. The court highlights the right to worship and the need for harmony among different religious groups.

Result: The court directs the petitioner to file a fresh application for permission, which the police should grant with conditions.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to give permission to conduct Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival scheduled at Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple situated at LRS Palayam, Tenkasi District as stated in the representation of the petitioner dated 21.08.2023 given to the respondent.)

1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to grant permission to conduct Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival at Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple situated at LRS Palayam, Tenkasi District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 21.08.2023.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is one of the conveners of Vinayagar Sadhurthi Festival Committee of Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple, which is more than 100 years old. Every year, Vinayagar Sadhurthi Festival will be celebrated in a grand manner by installing clay statue of Vinayagar and thereafter, the said statue will be taken through procession for immersion in Chitharu River.

3. He further submitted that on account of certain incidences in Tenkasi area, for few years permission for conducting Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival was not granted. In the year 2013, permission was granted to instal the idol of Vinayagar by imposing certain conditions in the temples of that locality. However, in the year 2015, permission was not granted for conducting Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival. Therefore, W.P.(MD)No.16533 of 2015 was filed and the said Writ Petition was allowed on 11.09.2015 with certain conditions. Hence, the festival was conducted peacefully. This year also, they are proposed to conduct Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival on 17.09.2023 evening and celebration will be conducted on 18.09.2023 and 19.09.2023. Hence, he sought for a direction to the respondent Police to give permission.

4. The petitioner''s counsel has fairly submitted that they will install the idol within the temple premises with regard to the procession of Vinayagar idol to be taken out for immersion, the petitioner is ready to abide whatever the conditions imposed by the respondent Police in respect of the route of the procession.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents submitted that in the year 2006 one Kumar Pandian was murdered in connection with the construction of Bazaar Mosque by muslims in the disputed site and in the year 2007, the brothers of the said Kumar Pandian were also brutally murdered by muslims and in the year 2008, bombs were planted in RSS building and new bus stand of Tenkasi. In the year 2018, during the Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival in Shenkottai, riot broke out in which 14 cases were registered against both Hindu and Muslims and more than 55 persons were arrested and 12 persons were detained under Act 14 of 1982.

6. He has further submitted that on 14.09.2018 in Tenkasi town, two Hindu shops were burnt for which criminal cases have been registered. Further, more than 1000 Police personnel are deployed at Vinayagar Sadhurthi immersion procession. He further submitted that as per G.O.Ms.No.598, dated 09.08.2018, installation of idols near other religious places / Hospitals / Education Institutions should be avoided. Therefore, no idol could be permitted in Malayan Street as there is a Mosque and School near the requested place. He further submitted that in case if the permission is given for the petitioner to install Vinayagar idol and take out through procession for immersion, it will create law and order problem. Finally he has submitted that the permission sought for has already been rejected.

7. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record carefully.

8. Every person in this Country will have a right to worship the God based on his / her religious faith. It has been a practice that in the temples, non-Hindu will come and worship, in the churches,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top