Back
D. NAGARJUN
G. Murali Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi & 0thers – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to give permission to conduct Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival scheduled at Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple situated at LRS Palayam, Tenkasi District as stated in the representation of the petitioner dated 21.08.2023 given to the respondent.)
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to grant permission to conduct Vinayagar Sadhurthi festival at Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple situated at LRS Palayam, Tenkasi District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 21.08.2023.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is one of the conveners of Vinayagar Sadhurthi Festival Committee of Shenbaga Vinayagar Temple, which is more than 100 years old. Every year, Vinayagar Sadhurthi Festival will be celebrated in a grand manner by installing clay statue of Vinayagar and thereafter, the said statue will be taken through procession for immersion in Chitharu River.
3. He further submitted that on account of certain incidences in
The right to worship and the promotion of harmony among different religious groups.
The right to worship based on religious faith and the prohibition of discrimination in granting permissions for religious celebrations.
The court emphasized that while the police cannot restrict religious processions arbitrarily, concerns about potential law and order issues can justify such restrictions, especially in cases motivate....
The court emphasizes the need for police protection during religious festivals while recognizing the rights of multiple parties to celebrate.
The court's decision was influenced by the circular memorandum issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, providing guidelines for consideration of applications seeking permission for cond....
Right to worship is fundamental; permission for limited poojas granted despite law and order concerns, prohibiting first honours.
Court directs Peace Committee to assess temple festival feasibility amid disputes and pending civil suit without injunction.
The Court may grant permission for religious festivals despite pending rival claims by allowing participation for prayer purposes while relegating the determination of ultimate control to independent....
The fundamental right to worship is not restricted to one temple, allowing groups to worship in different temples without coercion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
