IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
P. Ravichandran, Green Tree Homes and Ventures - Petitioner
Versus
Ajeet Kumar Kothari, Son of Padam Chand Kothari - Respondent
Crl. O.P. No.2600 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.No.1359 of 2016
Decided On : 18-07-2022
Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Director's Liability
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, as the fourth accused, sought to quash criminal proceedings against him for alleged offenses under the Negotiable Instruments Act, based on a dishonored cheque. The petitioner claimed that he had resigned from the directorship of the company before the issuance of the cheque and was not a signatory to it.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had resigned from the directorship before the issuance of the cheque and was not a signatory to it. Therefore, the court was inclined to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioner alone.
Issues: The main contention was the petitioner's resignation from the directorship and the lack of his signature on the cheque, which led to the question of his criminal liability.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's resignation from the directorship and the absence of his signature on the cheque, which absolved him from criminal liability.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was allowed, and the criminal proceedings against the petitioner were quashed.
ORDER :
(Prayer: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records culminating in the criminal proceedings pending against the Petitioner in C.C.No.1333 of 2015 on the file of the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and quash the same.)
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records culminating in the criminal proceedings pending against the Petitioner in C.C.No.1333 of 2015 on the file of the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and quash the same.
2. The Petitioner herein is the fourth accused in C.C.No.1333 of 2015 on the file of the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai. This Petition for quashing C.C.No.1333 of 2015 has been filed on the ground that on the date of issuance of cheque, the Petitioner was not a Director of the Company and was not a signatory to the cheque.
3. The Respondent herein filed a private complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences under Sections 138 & 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, on the basis of dishonoured cheque issued on 10.03.2015 and 10.04.2015 and the same was taken on file by the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai. Summons also issued to the 4th accused/Petitioner herein. This Petition was filed for quashment of above said complaint in respect of the 4th accused/Petitioner herein alone.
4. The main contention raised by the learned counsel for the Petitioner/4th accused is that he has resigned from the Directorship as early as on 13.06.2014 and filed Form 11 & 12 issued by the Registrar of Companies, regarding resignation of the Petitioner from the first accused company. Hence, as the Petitioner is not signatory to cheque nor Director of the A1 company on the date of cheque in issue, he cannot be mulcted with any criminal liability.
5. In view of the above said factual position, I am inclined to quash C.C.No.1333 of 2015, on the file of the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai as against the Petitioner herein alone and accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Directors can be absolved from criminal liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act if they have resigned from the directorship before the issuance of a dishonored cheque and are not signatories t....
The necessity of specific averments to fasten vicarious liability on a director under Section 141 of the N.I. Act, and the inability to quash the prosecution based on lack of specific averments in th....
A non-signatory director cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if not responsible for the company's conduct at the time of the offence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.