SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3937

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Vaidyanathan, Mohammed Shaffiq, JJ.
P. Dhandapani – Appellant
Versus
Villupuram District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ors. – Respondents
Writ Appeal No.1454 of 2021
Decided On : 15-12-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. K. Premkumar
For the Respondent: Mr. M.R. Gokulakrishnan, Addl.G.P., Mr.C.Selvaraj, Addl.G.P.

Employees of a Co-operative Society can approach the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act if the Scheme provides lesser benefits than the Act, and they have the right to choose the forum beneficial to them.

Headnote:

Payment of Gratuity Act - Applicability to Co-operative Society - Sections 153 and 154 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 7 and 8 of the Payment of Gratuity Act - [EMPLOYEE GRATUITY CLAIM] - [Co-operative Society] - [Sections 153, 154, 7, 8] - The court discussed the applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act to employees of a Co-operative Society and held that if the Scheme provides lesser benefits than the Act, employees can approach the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act. The court also emphasized the right of employees to choose the forum beneficial to them and ordered the gratuity amount with interest to be paid within a specified time period.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, an employee of a Co-operative Bank, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act after the bank failed to pay. The Management contended that a separate scheme for gratuity was in place under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that if the Scheme provides lesser benefits than the Act, employees can approach the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act. It emphasized the right of employees to choose the forum beneficial to them and ordered the gratuity amount with interest to be paid within a specified time period.

Issues: Applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act to employees of a Co-operative Society, the right of employees to choose the forum beneficial to them, and the obligation of the Management to pay gratuity as per the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that if the Scheme provides lesser benefits than the Act, employees can approach the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act and have the right to choose the forum beneficial to them.

Final Decision: The Writ Appeal was allowed, and the court ordered the gratuity amount with interest to be paid within a specified time period. No order as to costs.

JUDGMENT :

S.Vaidyanathan, J.

The appellant (third respondent in the Writ Petition) was employed in South Arcot District Central Co-operative Bank, which was bifurcated into Villupuram District Central Co-operative Bank and Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank with effect from 01.04.1996. After bifurcation, the appellant was working in Villupuram District Central Co-operative Bank Limited. The appellant had rendered sufficient years of service to get gratuity in terms of the Payment of Gratuity Act. Since the gratuity has not been paid, he moved an application before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act and the claim was granted in P.G.No.5/2012 on 14.06.2012. Aggrieved by the order of the Controlling Authority, the Management has preferred an appeal after depositing the amount as ordered by the Controlling Authority and the appellate authority, vide order dated 27.12.2012 in P.G.No.8 of 2012, confirmed the order of the Controlling Authority.

2. According to the appellant, surcharge proceedings have been initiated against him, which was set aside by the Co-operative Tribunal in C.M.A.No.23 of 2008. Since the appellant was allowed to continue and retire on attaining the age of superannuation at 58 years, the Bank ought to have paid gratuity, which was not done, which made him to prefer a claim before the Controlling Authority where he was successful and the appellate authority has also confirmed the order of the Controlling Authority, as stated supra.

3. The Management has contended that it is a Bank and has got a separate scheme for payment of gratuity in terms of its bye-laws. It is further contended that Clause 28 of the said Scheme provides for gratuity and there is a group gratuity cash amalgamations scheme of Life Insurance Corporation being maintained for payment of gratuity for the employees of the District Central Co-operative Bank and fund has also been created, which will not be utilised for any other purpose including business purposes and that the Controlling Authority has no locus-standi to entertain any application under the Payment of Gratuity Act.

4. The Management went on to contend that in terms of Section 79 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, a registered society not being an establishment to which the Payment of Gratuity Act applies, may provide in its bye-laws for payment of gratuity to the employees at such rates and on such conditions as may be specified in the bye-laws and such Society may establish a gratuity fund or make arrangement for the purpose. When the Management has created a separate Scheme for the purpose of payment of gratuity, the Controlling Authority has no locus-standi to entertain an application.

5. The learned Single Judge, on hearing both sides, proceeded to hold that the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act alone will govern the matter, as the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act is a special enactment and the Payment of Gratuity Act is a general law. Once the Management has decided to have a separate Scheme, approved by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, the grievance will have to be addressed only under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act and the Payment of Gratuity Act would not be applicable to the employees of a Co-operative Society.

6. The learned Single Judge has further held that in terms of Sections 153 and 154 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, the aggrieved persons will have to work out their remedy only before appropriate forum and not under the Payment of Gratuity Act.

7. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

8. It is not in dispute that if an employee has attained the age of superannuation on completion of sufficient years of service, he was an employee under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.

9. For the sake of convenience, Section 4(5) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, needs to be referred to, which is extracted as follows:

"Section 4: Payment of gratuity:

......

(5)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top