SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3591

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
B. Arjundas - Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Registration and Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & Ors. - Respondents
C.M.A. No. 236 of 2015
Decided On : 16-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Kubendran for M/s. Rank Associates.
For the Respondents: Mr. T.M. Pappiah, Special Government Pleader.

The assessment of property valuation under Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules is final, and courts should not interfere with such orders passed on merits.

Headnote:

Indian Stamp Act - Valuation of Property - Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 - The court confirmed the order of the competent authority under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, regarding the valuation of a property in a prime locality of Chennai city. The court held that the authorities considered the surrounding circumstances and market value prevailing in the locality as per Rule 5, and there was no infirmity in the valuation. The court emphasized that once the guiding factors under Rule 5 are followed, the assessment becomes final and courts should not interfere with such orders passed on merits.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant executed a sale deed for a property in a prime locality of Chennai city. The competent authority initiated proceedings under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act, objecting to the valuation and stamp duty paid. The Inspector General of Registration assessed the market value, and the appellant appealed against the order.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the authorities considered the surrounding circumstances and market value as per Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules, and there was no infirmity in the valuation. The court emphasized that once the guiding factors under Rule 5 are followed, the assessment becomes final and courts should not interfere with such orders passed on merits.

Issues: Valuation of property, application of Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules, authority's assessment under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the authorities' assessment based on the guiding factors under Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules is final, and courts should not interfere with such orders passed on merits.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and confirmed the order of the competent authority under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act.

JUDGMENT :

[Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 47-A(10) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, against the order dated 21.10.2005 passed by the 1st respondent confirming the order passed by the 2nd respondent on 01.02.2003 pertaining to Document bearing No.722 of 1998 with the office of the 3rd respondent.

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred against the order dated 21.10.2005 passed by the 1st respondent under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

2. The sale deed in question was executed by the appellant on 26.03.1998 and the valuation as well as the stamp duty paid were objected by the competent authority, and accordingly, 47-A(5) proceedings were initiated by the competent authority and the assessment was made by following the procedure contemplated. The authorities competent assessed the market value as Rs.2,500/- per sq.ft. taking note of the fact that the subject property situates in the prime locality of Chennai city, more specifically, nearby Egmore, and therefore, the appellant was directed to pay the deficit stamp duty as assessed by the competent authority. Not satisfied with the order, the appellant preferred an appeal under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act.

3. The Inspector General of Registration adjudicated the issue by providing opportunity to the appellant. Enquiry was conducted. The property situates at Block No.50, Marshall Road, Door Nos.124 and 125 and the extent of the land is 3 grounds and 1655 sq.ft. The Inspector General of Registration considered the value of the adjacent lands as well as the registration done in the nearby vicinity, and accordingly, made a finding which reads as under :

4. The authority competent found that it is a posh locality in the main city and mostly rich people are residing, big bungalows are constructed and further, important commercial premises are also found. The Government Eye Hospital, Fire Service Station, Rajarathinam Stadium, Raja Muthaiya Hall, Rani Meyyammai Hall are also situated in Marshall Road and the Egmore Railway Station is 1 km from the subject property. All these factors as well as the surrounding areas were taken into consideration and accordingly, the market value was fixed as Rs.2,500/- per sq.ft.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant mainly contended that the authorities have not considered the value of the property with reference to the prevailing situation. The authorities have not applied their mind. They have not considered the facts and circumstances with reference to the valuation rules. No copy of the reference has been furnished to the appellant. Therefore, the order impugned is infirm and is liable to be scrapped. It is contended that it is not open to the authorities to make a reference under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act. The Statute presupposes the twin elements of under valuation and intent to defraud the revenue. In the present case, no such element was established, and therefore, initiation of proceedings under Section 47-A(5) of the Indian Stamp Act itself is not sustainable.

6. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents brought to the knowledge of this Court that the valuation done as per the impugned order had also been paid by the appellant without any protest.

7. Considering the grounds raised by the parties to the lis on hand, it is relevant to consider Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968. Rule 5 contemplates the principles for determination of market value. Accordingly, the Collector shall, as far as possible, have also regard to the following points in arriving at the provisional market value. Rule 5(a) deals with lands, which enumerates the materials to be taken into consideration by the authorities competent and the same reads as follows :

    “5. ... (a) In the case of lands -

(i) classification of the land as dry, manavari, wet and the like;

(ii) classification under various tarams in the settlement regist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top