SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3228

K. MURALI SHANKAR
Felix Jerome – Appellant
Versus
Arockiya Preethy – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:A. Robinson, Advocate. For the Respondents:C. Suresh Kannan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records in D.V.C.No.5 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur and strike off the same.)

1. The Civil Revision Petition has been filed, invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking orders to call for the records in D.V.C.No.5 of 2023 pending on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur and strike off the same.

2. The first respondent, for herself and on behalf of her minor son has filed a petition under Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Domestic Violence Act against her husband and in-laws. The learned Magistrate, after taking the petition on file in D.V.C.No.5 of 2023, has issued summons to the petitioners to appear before the said Court. Challenging the issuance of summons, the petitioners have preferred the present Civil Revision.

3. Admittedly, the first petitioner is the husband, the second petitioner is the father-in-law, the third petitioner is the mother-in-law, the fourth petitioner is the sister-in-law and the fifth petitioner is the brotherin- law of the first respondent.

4. The main complaint of the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top