SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3097

S. SOUNTHAR
A. Selvamani – Appellant
Versus
Manickam Ammal – Respondent


For the Appellant :M/s. Muthumani Doraisami, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1 & R2, T.M. Hariharan, R3 & R4, T.S. Vijaya Raghavan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2015 made in A.S.No.3 of 2013 on the file of Principal District Judge, Salem confirming the judgment and decree dated 23.07.2012 made in O.S.No.124 of 2007 on the file of II Additional Sub-Ordinate Judge, Salem.)

1. The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant. She filed a suit for partition claiming 3/12 share in the suit properties against the respondents. The suit was partly decreed in respect of “D” schedule properties in Ex.A1, Partition Deed dated 25.04.1966. The suit was dismissed in respect of “C” schedule properties in Ex.A1, Partition Deed. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant/plaintiff preferred an appeal. The First Appellate Court also affirmed the findings of the Trial Court. Hence, the appellant has come before this Court by way of this second appeal.

2. According to the appellant/plaintiff, the suit properties originally belonged to Marimuthu Padayachi and his brothers. The said Marimuthu Padayachi had two sons namely Kuppusamy and Narayanan. The appellant/plaintiff is the daughter-in-law of said Narayanan and her husband Subramaniam died o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top