SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3211

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SENTHILKUMAR
A. Ramakrishnan @ Ramakrishnappa – Appellant
Versus
N. Parvathi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :T.M. Hariharan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R2 to R4, T. Panchatsaram, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeal suit has been filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge, Hosur dated 26.04.2017 in O.S.No.20 of 013 and to decree the said suit as prayed for.)

R. Subramanian, J.

1. The plaintiff in OS No.20 of 2013 an audacious suit by an agreement holder for a declaration that the Sale Deed dated 27.08.2012 executed by the purchaser from the agreement vendor in favour of M/s.Micro Surgical Instrument Limited, rep. by its Director Mrs.Balamanimegalai, for an injunction against the fourth defendant from alienating the suit property and for a direction to the fifth Defendant viz. the Sub Registrar not to register any transaction concerning the suit property is on appeal challenging its dismissal.

2. The brief facts that led to the filing of the suit are as follows:

2.1. The plaintiff claims to have entered into an agreement of sale with the first defendant on 19.01.2011 under Ex.A3. As per the said Agreement, the plaintiff has agreed to purchase the suit property for a total consideration of Rs.73,50,424/- and has also parted with a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards advance. It is a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top