2023 Supreme(Mad) 3144
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. ILANGOVAN, J.
Selvam & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli & Anr. - Respondents
Crl. OP (MD) No. 17794 of 2023 & Crl. MP (MD) Nos. 14082 & 14083 of 2023
Decided On : 13-10-2023
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transportation of petroleum Class B does not require a license if the quantity does not exceed 2500 liters, as per Section 7 of the Petroleum Act.
Headnote:
Petroleum Act - Quashment of Criminal Case - Section 23, Section 7 - Summary: The court quashed the criminal case against the petitioners based on the interpretation of Section 23 and Section 7 of the Petroleum Act. The court found that no license is required for transporting petroleum Class B if the quantity does not exceed 2500 liters, and the prosecution failed to establish that the transported petroleum exceeded this limit. The court emphasized the importance of sampling and the Investigating Officer's lapse in not conducting it before filing the final report.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought quashment of a criminal case filed against them for transporting diesel without proper permission or license. They argued that the seized diesel fell under clause B of the Petroleum Act and no permission was required if the total quantity did not exceed 2500 liters.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish that the transported diesel exceeded the limit of 2500 liters, as required by Section 7 of the Petroleum Act. The Investigating Officer's failure to conduct sampling before filing the final report was deemed as a lapse that vitiated the entire prosecution.
Issues: The main issue was whether the transportation of diesel by the petitioners violated the provisions of the Petroleum Act, specifically Section 23 and Section 7.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 23 and Section 7 of the Petroleum Act, emphasizing that no license is required for transporting petroleum Class B if the quantity does not exceed 2500 liters. The court highlighted the importance of sampling and the Investigating Officer's lapse in not conducting it before filing the final report.
Final Decision: The criminal original petition stands allowed, and the case in STC No.3879 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli is quashed against the petitioners. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition has been filed under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings in STC No.3879 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District and quash the same as illegal and pass such other or other orders.)
1. This criminal original petition has been filed seeking quashment of the case in STC No.3879 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief:-
The de-facto complainant along with his police team were on the routine patrol duty, on 15/05/2023 at about 08.30 am near Thatchanallur-Madurai main road. At that time, they found the vehicle bearing registration No.TN-96-B-2749. It was intercepted and found in possession of 900 Litres of diesel. No proper permission or licence as the case may be was available. On enquiry, the driver of the vehicle stated that the first accused namely Balamurugan is the quarry owner. At his instruction, diesel was purchased in bulk. On the basis of the above said occurrence, a case in Crime No.283 of 2023 was registered for the offences under section 285 IPC and section 23 of the Petroleum Act. After completing the investigation, final report was filed making the allegations against the accused persons and it was taken cognizance in STC No.3879 of 2023 by the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tiruelveli.
3. Seeking quashment of the same, A2 and A3 have filed this petition on the ground that the seized diesel falls under clause B of Petroleum Act; As per section 7 of the Act, no permission is required for transporting and storying of clause B petroleum, if the total quantity does not exceed 2500 liters.
4. Heard both sides.
5. The learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that no violation of either Petroleum Act or Control Order is committed. He would also rely upon the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Kran Singh Vs. State of Madhaya Pradesh and another (M.Cr.C No.11349 of 2015, dated 27/03/2017).
6. Section 23 of the Petroleum Act reads as under:-
“23.General penalty for offences under this Act:
(1)Whoever-
(a)in contravention of any of the provisions of Chapter 1 or of any of the rules made thereunder, imports, transports, stores, produces, refines or blends any petroleum, or
(b)contravenes any rule made under sec. 4 or sec. 5, or
(c)being the holder of a licence issued under Sec. 4 or a person for the time being placed by the holder of such licence in control or in charge of any place where petroleum is being imported or stored, or is under transport, contravenes any condition of such licence or suffers any condition of such licence to be contravened, or
(d)being for the time being in control or in charge of any place where petroleum is being imported, stored, produced, refined or blended or is under transport, refuses or neglects to show to any officer authorized under section 13 any receptacle, plant or appliance used in such place in connection with petroleum, or in any way obstructs or fails to render reasonable assistance to such officer during an inspection, or
(e)being for the time being in control or in charge of any place where petroleum is being imported, transported, stored, produced, refined or blended, refuses or neglects to show to any officer authorized under section 14 any petroleum in such place, or to give him such assistance as he may require for the inspection of such petroleum, or refuses to allow him to take samples of the petroleum, or
(f)being required, under section 27, to give information of an accident, fails to give such information as so required by that section,shall be punishable with simple imprisonment which may extend to one month or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. (2) If any person, having been