BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
M. Sakthivel – Petitioner
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others – Respondents
W.P. (MD) No. 5233 of 2024
Decided On : 06-03-2024
Writ Petition - Police Protection - Dispute over Commencement of Temple Festival
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking police protection for a temple festival. The festival was marred by a dispute over the commencement tradition, specifically the distribution of Holy ash (vibhuti) to devotees.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the dispute regarding the commencement tradition to be referred to the Civil Court and arranged for a Peace Committee Meeting to resolve the issue. The court emphasized conducting the festival amicably and granted powers to the impleaded respondents to pass appropriate orders.
Issues: Dispute over commencement tradition, police protection for temple festival
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to resolve the dispute through civil court and the emphasis on conducting the festival amicably.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to refer the dispute to the Civil Court and arrange for a Peace Committee Meeting.
JUDGMENT :
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to provide adequate Police protection to the festival of Sri Mahasivarathir Festival to be held at Sri Periandavar Swami Temple, Nalliveeranpatti Hamlet of Seemanoothu Revenue Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District on 8th and 9th March, 2024 based on Petitioner's representation, dated 27.02.2024.
1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner had filed this petition for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, seeking direction against the Respondent Police to provide adequate Police protection to the festival of Sri Mahasivarathir Festival to be held at Sri Periandavar Swami Temple, Nalliveeranpatti Hamlet of Seemanoothu Revenue Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District on 08.03.2024 and 09.03.2024, based on Petitioner's representation, dated 27.02.2024.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Intervenor submitted that he had filed an impleading petition in W.M.P. (MD) No. 5241 of 2024. The same is allowed vide order dated 06.03.2024 and the Intervenor is impleaded as 6th Respondent.
3. As per the submission of the learned Counsel for the impleaded sixth Respondent, the Petitioner himself claims to be a “Periya Thevar” of the said Temple. Only the said “Periya Thevar” will distribute Holy ash (vibhuti) to the devotees as commencement of Sri Mahasivarathiri Festival, which is objected by the learned Counsel for the impleaded sixth Respondent stating that the sixth Respondent also has a right in the said Temple. The said Temple has 3 branches of hereditary trustee. During festival time, one of them is selected as “Periya Thevar” for commencement of the Temple festival and the selected “Periya Thevar” will distribute Holy ash (vibhuti) to all the devotees as symbolic customary of the tradition for commencement of the Temple festival. This tradition is followed for more than 200 years. For the past 15 years, since there was dispute between the 3 branches of the hereditary trustee, the Temple was closed without organizing the festival even on important occasions. In the last year, all the 3 branches agreed that instead of “Periya Thevar” the Priest himself can distribute Holy ash (vibhuti) to the devotees, as the customary and tradition for the commencement of the Sri Mahasivarathiri Festival.
4. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the impleaded sixth Respondent that instead of the Petitioner herein, if the Priest of the Temple himself distributes Holy ash (vibhuti) to the devotees as customary practice, they have no objection. The learned Counsel for the impleaded sixth Respondent made an objection for the Petitioner herein, who claims himself to be a “Periya Thevar” to follow the customary practice of distributing Holy ash (vibhuti) to the devotees of the Temple. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the impleaded sixth Respondent had made objections and seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on instructions of the Respondent Police would submit that the Respondent Police does not have any objection, if both the parties agreed for conducting the Temple festival without any violence. Also the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submits that previously there was a dispute and the matter was referred to the Revenue Divisional Officer.
6. Considering the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for the impleaded sixth Respondent, this Court is of the view that the dispute regarding who shall conduct commencement of tradition, shall be relegated in future date by referring the dispute to the Civil Court concerned by either of the parties. Considering the dispute between the impleaded sixth Respondent and the Petitioner, the Respondents 2 and 3 in this Writ Petition are re-arranged as Respondents 4 and 5 and this Court suo motu impleads the Rev
Temple administration disputes resolved via civil suit; writ court directs peace committee for peaceful festival with police protection.
The court determined that police protection for a temple festival cannot be granted due to a pending civil suit over the temple's administration, yet allowed the festival to proceed under cooperative....
Court grants police protection for temple festival with conditions of inclusive participation and no excommunication.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.