Back
B. PUGALENDHI
Maheswari – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B. PUGALENDHI, J.
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate disciplinary action as against respondents 6 to 13 and to pay punitive compensation for the death caused to the petitioner's husband namely Esakki Muthu by respondents 6 to 13 with 18% interest per annum based on her representations dated 21.07.2014 and 22.07.2014 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.
1. This is yet another incident of custodial violence. The petitioner a widow has approached this Court in the year 2014 for a writ of mandamus seeking compensation for the death of her husband Easkki Muthu and also for an appropriate action as against the officials, who are responsible for the cause of the death.
2. The case of the petitioner is that her husband Esakki Muthu was taken to the Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai by the police officials on 13.07.2014 under the guise of an enquiry, where he was beaten brutally and he suffered serious injuries. Therefore in order to escape from the consequences, a case was foisted as against her husband for the offence under Secti
The judgment establishes the need for stringent action against custodial torture and the failure to curtail such incidents, emphasizing the findings of the learned Judicial Magistrate and the governm....
The State has a constitutional obligation to ensure the safety of individuals in police custody; custodial deaths demand scrutiny and compensatory measures for rights violations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of strict liability for the negligence of the police in cases of custodial deaths, emphasizing the fundamental rights of prisoners an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to award compensation for custodial torture under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the calculation of compensati....
The State is responsible for tortuous acts of its employees, and the award of compensation against the State is an appropriate remedy for the infringement of fundamental rights under Article 21 of th....
Court established that mere allegations of custodial torture are insufficient; claims must be substantiated by evidence of violation of fundamental rights to warrant compensation.
The court emphasized the necessity for independent investigations into custodial deaths and affirmed the intrinsic protection of the right to life under Article 21, mandating scrutiny in cases of sus....
The court has the power to award compensation for custodial death under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
