SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 448

G. ILANGOVAN
M. Jeyagopal – Appellant
Versus
S. Raguraman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K.A. Ramakrishnan.
For the Respondent: V. Shathurthi Raja.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer : Civil Revision Petition has been filed under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the fair and decreetal order in IA No.02 of 2021 in OS No.67 of 2019, dated 19/10/2023 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 19/10/2023 passed in in IA No.02 of 2021 in OS No.67 of 2019, dated 19/10/2023 by the 1st Additional District Judge, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.

2. The facts in brief:-

Suit in OS No.67 of 2019 was filed by the respondent herein seeking the relief of specific performance and alternative prayer for returning the principal amount with subsequent interest and for costs.

3. The petitioner herein received the summon, but failed to appear before the trial court, on 04/09/2019. So ex-parte decree was passed. To set aside the ex-parte decree, a delay occurred about 576 days. To condone the delay, he filed a petition under section 5 of the Limitation Act. That came to be dismissed by the trial court by the impugned order.

4. Against which, this civil revision petition is preferred.

5. Heard both sides.

6. As

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top