Back
K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Soumady – Appellant
Versus
Rajasekaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the appeal and plaintiff's claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendants' contentions on property ownership. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. issues framed in the trial court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. trial court's findings on shares and applicable law. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. substantial questions of law identified for appeal. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. applicability of hindu succession act and migration implications. (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. legal rights of married daughters under hindu law. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. court's modification of appeal judgment. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 9. remanding of the suit for additional evidence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 10. remand decisions should follow procedural fairness. (Para 34) |
| 11. conclusion of the appeal ruling. (Para 42) |
JUDGMENT :
K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.
Prayer: This second appeal is filed under section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2014 made in A.S. No. 24 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pondicherry, in modifying the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2012 made in O.S. No. 116 of 2006 on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Pondicherry.
1. The second appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree date
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
