V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Sundrambal – Appellant
Versus
Paneerselvam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
Prayer in S.A. No. 976 of 2013: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree in A.S. No. 68 of 2011 dated 28.03.2013 on the file of the Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 400 of 2004 dated 31.10.2011 on the file of the Court of Additional District Munsif, Tindivanam. In S.A. No. 977 of 2013 Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree in A.S. No. 69 of 2011 dated 28.03.2013 on the file of the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 356 of 2004 dated 31.10.2011 on the file of the Court of Additional District Munsif, Tindivanam.
1. These two Second Appeals arise out of two suits filed for declaration of possessory title and consequential relief of injunction. O.S. No. 356 of 2004 was filed by one R. Mani and Vijayalakshmi against one Paneerselvam. Similarly, O.S. No. 400 of 2004 was filed by the following persons, Sundarambal, Thillai Karasi, Pachayappan and Shiek Mehaboob Basha against Paneerselvam and Jambulingam.
2. The case of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.