IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar, JJ.
K. Mohamed Ansar and Another – Petitioners
Versus
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and Others – Respondents
WP. No. 20414 of 2018
Decided On : 18-03-2024
Slum Area - Unauthorised Encroachments - Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 4, 5
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Writ of Mandamus to remove unauthorised encroachments of hut dwellers and restore a road in a notified slum area. The respondents failed to develop the land as per the Act, leading to further encroachments.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Slum Clearance Board and the Chennai Corporation failed in their duty to develop the slum area and maintain public safety, health, and sanitation. The court directed the respondents to initiate appropriate actions to de-notify the slum area or develop it as per the Act and to remove road encroachments.
Issues: Unauthorised encroachments in a notified slum area, failure of authorities to develop the area as per the Act, and the duty to maintain public safety and health.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that after the declaration of a slum area, the authorities must follow the procedures as per the Act, and no person shall erect any building in the slum area without prior permission. The authorities' failure to act was deemed irresponsible and a serious lapse.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to initiate actions to de-notify the slum area or develop it as per the Act, remove road encroachments, and prosecute those with fraudulent records. The exercise was to be completed within four months.
JUDGMENT :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to remove the unauthorised encroachments of hut dwellers and restore 50' road lying between the Vathiyar Thottam on the West, Sherkhan Garden on the East, Arya Gowda Road on the South and Director's Colony 4th Main Road on the Rangarajapuram on the North situated in Rangarajapuram, Kodambakkam, Chennai-600 024.)
1. The Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents herein to remove the unauthorised encroachments of hut dwellers and restore 50' road lying between the Vathiyar Thottam on the West, Sherkhan Garden on the East, Arya Gowda Road on the South and Director's Colony 4th Main Road on the Rangarajapuram on the North situated in Rangarajapuram, Kodambakkam, Chennai-600 024.
2. It is not in dispute between the parties that the subject property has been notified as 'slum area' in G.O.Ms.No.1634, dated 14.12.1971 under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 [hereinafter referred to as the 'Act', in short]. Though it was notified under the Act, the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, now renamed as Urban Habitat Development Board, has failed in its duty to develop the land as contemplated under the provisions of the Act. On account of inaction on the part of the Slum Clearance Board, further encroachments are made in that locality.
3. Smt.AL.Ganthimathi, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, would submit that the encroachments have gone to the extent of encroaching upon public roads and therefore, the private individuals residing in that locality, have no free ingress and egress. On account of large scale encroachments in that locality, several representations were submitted, but no actions were taken. Thus the present writ petition came to be instituted by the writ petitioners.
4. Mr.G.Venkatesan, learned Standing Counsel for the Urban Habitat Development Board, would submit that the area was admittedly declared as 'slum area' under the Act. But the Slum Clearance Board has not developed the same and has addressed a letter to the Competent authority to de-notify the area, on 10.08.2017. However, it is yet to be de-notified. Thus the area is under the control of the Slum Clearance Board as of now. Therefore, they are duty bound to protect the land and develop the same if possible, otherwise, they are bound to initiate immediate action. After notifying a particular area as 'slum area', further encroachments, at no circumstances, be permitted, depriving the other residents of that locality from using public roads.
5. Mr.G.T.Subramanian, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Chennai Corporation, made a submission that they are not in a position to remove the encroachments, since the area has been notified as 'slum area' under the Act.
6. Declaration of slum areas, registration of buildings and restriction on building etc., in slum areas, are made under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Act, which read as under:-
“3. Declaration of slum areas.- (1) Where the Government are satisfied that-
(a) any area is or may be a source of danger to the health, safety or convenience of the public of that area or of its neighborhood, by reason of the area being low-lying, insanitary, squalid, overcrowded or otherwise; or
(b) the buildings in any area, used or intended to be used for human habitation are- (i) in any respect, unfit for human habitation; or (ii) by reason of dilapidation, over-crowding, faulty arrangement and design of such buildings, narrowness or faulty arrangement of streets, lack of ventilation, light or sanitation facilities, or any combination of these factors, detrimental to safety, health or morals, they may by notification, declare such area to be a slum area.
(2) In determining whether a building is unfit for human habitation, for the purposes of this Act,
AI
The main legal point established is that the authorities have a duty to develop slum areas as per the Act and prevent unauthorised encroachments, failing which appropriate actions can be directed by ....
Eviction procedures under the Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act must comply with legal protocols; encroachers are not entitled to claim accommodation.
Court directed the removal of illegal encroachments on public roads within a specified timeframe.
Duty of Revenue Authorities to protect Government lands and take action against encroachments, and the need for vigilance in dealing with encroachments and violations to protect public properties.
Municipal authorities are legally obligated to remove encroachments from public streets to ensure public access, subject to following due process of law.
State must protect livelihood of long-term homeless street occupiers by identifying eligible persons and providing alternate accommodation under schemes before systematic removal of encroachments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.