National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. vs Superintending Engineer

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Mad) 929

N. SESHASAYEE
National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.E.Omprakash, Senior Counsel Assisted by Mr.Imayavaramban for M/s.Ramalingam & Associates
For the Respondents: Ms.Keerthana R.Shenoi for Mr.V.Venkata Seshaiya Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO [R1 & R2]

ORDER :

JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned demand notice dated 19.01.2022 in Lr.No.SE/CEDC/CUD/DFC/ AO/REV/ASS.No.384/2022 on the file of the respondents and quash the same as being contrary to law and decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, as such arbitrary, highhanded, illegal, without jurisdiction and direct the respondents to forthwith provide the electricity connection as applied by the petitioner.

	TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.No	Contents
1.	The Facts
2.	The Arguments
3.	Discussion and Decision:
	a. Setting the stage
	b. A Preludial Statement
	c. A brief overview of the IBC and its working
	d. IBC & Scope for Misuse
	e. Operational Creditors & Right to Property
	f. IBC & Neutral Tribunal
	g. Discussion on the Authorities
	h. The M.K. Rajagopalan Effect
	i. Role of the CoC Redefined 31
	j. Understanding the “Relevant Information” & sourcing them:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Mad) 929

N. SESHASAYEENational Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. – AppellantVersusSuperintending Engineer – Respondent

Cases Referred (12)

N. SESHASAYEE
National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer – Respondent