Back
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
T. Kannan – Appellant
Versus
Agricultural Production Commissioner and Secretary to the Government, Department of Agriculture, Fort St. George, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER :
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned seniority list in the post of Assistant Engineer signed on 10.04.2017, on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to prepare the seniority of the petitioners in the post of Assistant Engineers, taking the date of initial appointment as regularized vide the G.O.Ms.No.94, Agriculture (Ve.Ni.3) Department, dated 26.05.2012 and accordingly promote the petitioners as the Assistant Executive Engineers within the time stipulated by this Court.
It is brought to the notice of this Court by learned Additional Government Pleader for the official respondents that subsequent to the filing of this Writ Petition, promotion has been given to the petitioner and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.
2.The petitioner has challenged the seniority panel in this writ petition. The Writ Petition was filed in the year 2017. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also admits that promotion was given to the petitioner subsequent to
Established seniority lists must be adhered to unless timely objections are raised; age considerations alone do not override settled seniority.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the seniority list should be prepared based on the existing orders in force during the relevant period, and the court may consider revising se....
The court established that stakeholders' interests must be considered in administrative decisions regarding seniority and promotions, allowing for representations to be made and addressed appropriate....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the second respondent to pass necessary orders for the fixation of correct seniority on par with S. Shanmugam in th....
Prompt action is required in matters relating to seniority, and belated interference with settled matters can have adverse effects and serious administrative implications.
The court emphasized that denial of promotion based on fabricated charges violates administrative fairness and ignored prescribed ratio guidelines for promotions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
