SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1087

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S. Thirupathi – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Theni District, Theni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K. Guhan.
For the Respondent:Mr. S. Kameswaran, Government Advocate.

ORDER :

(Abdul Quddhose, J.) :

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No. 4181/2013-R-3 dated 27.05.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate in service with all back wages, continuity of services, attendant benefits etc.)

On the last hearing date i.e., on 13.08.2024, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, earlier a memo dated 05.03.2018 was filed by learned Counsel for the petitioner stating that he has returned the case bundle to his client and he has also given change of vakalat. After recording the memo dated 05.03.2018 referred to supra, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner and to post the matter for hearing today [28.08.2024].

2. As directed by this Court, the Registry has printed the name of the petitioner. Despite printing the name of the petitioner, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. This Writ Petition is of the year 2017. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top