SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1097

M. SUNDAR, K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Fatima – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, rep by its Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh, New Delhi-110 003 – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr.A.Yogeshwaran, Ms.B.Poongkhulali along with Mr.Nagesh Nakhul, Mr.Iraiyanbu Prasad, Mr.M.V.Swaroop.
For the Respondents:Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan, Addl.Solicitor General of India assisted by Dr. G. Babu, Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. V. Chandrasekaran, Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. R. Shunmugasundaram then Advocate General instructed by Mr. P. Muthukumar, State Government Pleader assisted by Ms. A.G. Shakeena, Ms. Sona Sathish Kumar, Mr. J. Ravindran, Additional Advocate General instructed by Dr. T. Seenivasan, Spl.G.P.
For the Intervenors : Mr. P.S. Raman, Senior Counsel and Mr. Satish Parasaran, Senior Counsel for Mr. Karthik Sundaram along with Ms. Deepika Murali, Mr. P. Wilson, Senior Counsel for Mr. M. Pradeep Shankar, Mr. Naveen Kumar Murthi, along with Ms. M. Mahamani.

Table of Content
1. petitions challenge actions of the ministry of environment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's observations on procedural adherence in judicial hierarchy. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments presented regarding ex post facto environmental clearances. (Para 11 , 12 , 17 , 18)
4. summary of significant precedents relevant to ex post facto clearances. (Para 13)
5. court's reasoning regarding environmental laws and regulations. (Para 14 , 15 , 26)
6. final ruling on the validity of the office memoranda concerning environmental clearances. (Para 27 , 28)
7. final judgment allowing petitions and clarifying non-compliance actions. (Para 29)

ORDER :

(M. Sundar, J.) :

This common order will govern the captioned three 'Writ Petitions' ('W.Ps' in plural and 'W.P.' in singular for the sake of brevity), captioned 'writ miscellaneous petitions' thereat ('W.M.Ps' in plural and 'W.M.P' in singular for the sake of brevity), captioned Contempt Petition and Sub Application thereat.

2. In 'captioned W.P.(MD)No.8866 of 2021' (hereinafter 'I Fatima WP' for the sake of convenience) inter-alia a 'Office Memorandum' [hereinafter 'OM' in singular and 'OMs' in plural, though plural of 'memorandu

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top