Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, V. SIVAGNANAM, JJ.
Latha - Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of Home, Prohibition & Excise & Ors. - Respondents
H.C.P. No. 1389 of 2024
Decided On : 09-08-2024
HABEAS CORPUS - DETENTION ORDER - The court addressed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Habeas Corpus concerning the detention of Prasanth. The court noted that the detention order had been revoked by the competent authority, leading to the conclusion that no further adjudication was necessary.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking the release of his son, Prasanth, who was detained in Central Prison, Puzhal-II under an order that was claimed to be illegal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the detention order had already been revoked by the competent authority, rendering the petition moot.
Issues: Whether the court should adjudicate on the legality of the detention order when it has already been revoked.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once a detention order is revoked, the basis for the Habeas Corpus petition ceases to exist, and thus no further judicial intervention is warranted.
Result: The Habeas Corpus Petition was closed as the detention order had been revoked.
ORDER :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
[PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in Memo No.562/BCDFGISSSV/2024 passed by the 2nd respondent on 21.05.2024 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to produce the petitioner son Prasanth Son of Venkatesan aged about 21 years before this Court, who is now detained in Central Prison, Puzhal-II, and set him at liberty.]
Mr. E. Raj Thilak, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents made a submission that the impugned order of detention has already been revoked by the competent Authority and thus no further adjudication needs to be undertaken.
2. In view of the above submission, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed.
A Habeas Corpus petition becomes moot when the detention order under challenge is revoked by the competent authority.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus becomes moot when the detention order has been revoked by the competent authority.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus is rendered moot when the detention order being challenged has been revoked by the competent authority.
A Habeas Corpus petition becomes moot when the detention order being challenged is revoked by the competent authority.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus is rendered moot when the detention order being challenged has been revoked by the competent authority.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus becomes moot when the detention order has been revoked by the competent authority.
The revocation of a detention order by the competent authority negates the need for judicial review of the order.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus is rendered moot when the detention order has been revoked by the competent authority.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus is rendered moot when the detention order has been revoked by the competent authority.
A Habeas Corpus petition becomes moot when the detention order being challenged is revoked by the competent authority.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
