Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, V. SIVAGNANAM
Vasu – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed in S.C. No. 24/2024 dated on 27.06.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent and set aside the same and directing the respondents to produce the petitioner's son by namely Thiru.Vasigaran, son of Vasu, aged about 21 years before this Court now confined in Central Prison, Salem, and set him at liberty.
1. The petitioner herein is the father of the detenu viz. Vasigaran, son of Vasu, aged about 21 years, now confined at Central Prison, Salem, has come forward with this Habeas Corpus Petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent in S.C. No. 24/2024 dated 27.06.2024.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in passing the order of detention.
4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 15.05.2024 and thereafter, the detention order came
Inordinate delays in detention orders can invalidate the order due to the severance of the necessary link between grounds and purpose of detention.
Inordinate delay in detention order issuance can invalidate the order by severing the necessary link between grounds and purpose of detention.
Inordinate and unexplained delay in detention orders can invalidate the order by severing the necessary link between grounds and purpose of detention.
Unexplained and inordinate delay in passing a detention order can invalidate the order by severing the necessary link between the grounds and purpose of detention.
Unexplained and inordinate delay in issuing a detention order can invalidate the order by severing the necessary link between grounds and purpose of detention.
Inordinate delay in detention order issuance can invalidate the order if it disrupts the necessary link between grounds and purpose of detention.
Inordinate delay in passing a preventive detention order after arrest invalidates the order due to the absence of a live link between grounds and purpose of detention.
Unexplained delays in preventive detention orders violate personal liberty and render such orders invalid.
Inordinate delays in detention orders can invalidate them if they sever the link between the grounds for detention and the purpose of detention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
